A review of professionalism within LIS

Cannon, P. (2017) A review of professionalism within LIS. Library Management, 38(2/3), pp. 142-152. (doi: 10.1108/LM-07-2016-0053)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of professionalism within Library and Information Science (LIS) and in doing so draw comparisons with the education and medicine professions. Design/methodology/approach: The paper provides a review of the extant literature from the three professions and gives a brief review of the theoretical constructs of professional knowledge using the work of Eisner and Eraut to explore knowledge types. It then relates these definitions to knowledge use within LIS, education and medicine, before examining the roles that professional associations have on the knowledge development of a profession. It concludes with a reflection on the future of professionalism within LIS. Findings: The literature suggests a fragmented epistemological knowledge-base and threats to its practices from outside professions. It does, however, find opportunities to redefine its knowledge boundaries within the phronetic practices of LIS and in socio-cultural uses of knowledge. It finds strengths and weaknesses in professionalism within LIS and its practitioners. Originality/value: This review provides a contemporary update to several earlier, related, works and provides useful context to current efforts to professionalise LIS by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Cannon, Dr Paul
• Authors: Cannon, P.
• College/School: University Services > Library and Collection Services > Library
• Journal Name: Library Management
• Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• ISSN: 0143-5124
• ISSN (Online): 1758-7921
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2017 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• First Published: First published in Library Management 38(2/3): 142-152
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher