Complex responses to movement-based disease control: when livestock trading helps

Prentice, J. C., Marion, G., Hutchings, M. R., MCneilly, T. N. and Matthews, L. (2017) Complex responses to movement-based disease control: when livestock trading helps. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface, 14(126), 20160531. (doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0531) (PMID:28077759) (PMCID:PMC5310727)

[img]
Preview
Text
132474.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

667kB

Abstract

Livestock disease controls are often linked to movements between farms, for example, via quarantine and pre- or post-movement testing. Designing effective controls, therefore, benefits from accurate assessment of herd-to-herd transmission. Household models of human infections make use of R*, the number of groups infected by an initial infected group, which is a metapopulation level analogue of the basic reproduction number R0 that provides a better characterization of disease spread in a metapopulation. However, existing approaches to calculate R* do not account for individual movements between locations which means we lack suitable tools for livestock systems. We address this gap using next-generation matrix approaches to capture movements explicitly and introduce novel tools to calculate R* in any populations coupled by individual movements. We show that depletion of infectives in the source group, which hastens its recovery, is a phenomenon with important implications for design and efficacy of movement-based controls. Underpinning our results is the observation that R* peaks at intermediate livestock movement rates. Consequently, under movement-based controls, infection could be controlled at high movement rates but persist at intermediate rates. Thus, once control schemes are present in a livestock system, a reduction in movements can counterintuitively lead to increased disease prevalence. We illustrate our results using four important livestock diseases (bovine viral diarrhoea, bovine herpes virus, Johne's disease and Escherichia coli O157) that each persist across different movement rate ranges with the consequence that a change in livestock movements could help control one disease, but exacerbate another.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Prentice, Dr Jamie and Mcneilly, Dr Tom and Marion, Professor Glenn and Matthews, Professor Louise
Authors: Prentice, J. C., Marion, G., Hutchings, M. R., MCneilly, T. N., and Matthews, L.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Journal of the Royal Society: Interface
Publisher:The Royal Society
ISSN:1742-5689
ISSN (Online):1742-5689
Published Online:11 January 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 The Authors
First Published:First published i Journal of the Royal Society: Interface 14(126):20160531
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
569671Ecological and socioeconomic factors impacting maintenance and dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the Greater Serengeti EcosystemLouise MatthewsBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/K01126X/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
629831The influence of selective breeding on MHC diversityMichael StearBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/L004070/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
627871Social, economic and environmental drivers of zoonoses in Tanzania (SEEDZ)Sarah CleavelandBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/L018926/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
627871Social, economic and environmental drivers of zoonoses in Tanzania (SEEDZ)Sarah CleavelandBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/L018926/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED