A community of practice: sport journalism, mobile media and institutional change

Hutchins, B. and Boyle, R. (2017) A community of practice: sport journalism, mobile media and institutional change. Digital Journalism, 5(5), pp. 496-512. (doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1234147)

[img]
Preview
Text
131747.pdf - Accepted Version

259kB

Abstract

Over two decades ago, Barbie Zelizer argued that journalists should be approached as an “interpretive community” in order to understand the processes through which journalists generate shared meanings around major political events. This article refocuses Zelizer’s concept in order to analyse the consequences of rapid technological transformation, fraught industry conditions, and disparate audience formations in the context of contemporary news media and journalism. Focusing on the challenges faced by professional sport journalists, we invoke the concept of “community of practice” to make sense of this fluid and commercially volatile context, using it to analyse empirically the experiences of journalists in Australia and Scotland. Informed by the interrelationship that exists between formats of news and the practices that produce it, this paper presents evidence drawn from in-depth semi-structured interviews with journalists, editors, news presenters and commentators who specialise in and/or work across newspapers, radio, television, online and mobile media. Understood as a community of practice, sport journalists are shown to be under pressure because of mutually reinforcing changes in mobile and digital media technologies, journalistic routines and institutional relations.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Boyle, Professor Raymond
Authors: Hutchins, B., and Boyle, R.
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Culture and Creative Arts > Theatre Film and TV Studies
Journal Name:Digital Journalism
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:2167-0811
ISSN (Online):2167-082X
Published Online:04 October 2016
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 Routledge
First Published:First published in Digital Journalism 5(5): 496-512
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record