McDonnell, N. (2018) Transitivity and proportionality in causation. Synthese, 195(3), pp. 1211-1229. (doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1263-1)
|
Text
130989.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 451kB |
Abstract
It is widely assumed that causation is transitive, but putative counterexamples abound. These examples come in three varieties: switching cases, short circuit cases, and what I will call mismatch cases. In this paper I focus on the mismatch variety, which is widely taken to be the easiest to resolve. I will first introduce the cases and the existing strategy for dealing with them, then present a new counterexample which is immune to that strategy. In response to this new counterexample I will introduce a novel solution, one drawing on Yablo’s proportionality principle for causation. There is a catch, however. Either proportionality is a strong constraint—it constrains which causal claims are true—and the solution works, or it is not and causation is not transitive after all. I will argue that the first horn has unacceptable consequences and should be rejected, but that the second horn may be less costly than it initially appears.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | McDonnell, Dr Neil |
Authors: | McDonnell, N. |
College/School: | College of Arts > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | Synthese |
Publisher: | Springer Netherlands |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 |
ISSN (Online): | 1573-0964 |
Published Online: | 17 November 2016 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 The Author |
First Published: | First published in Synthese 195(3):12111-1229 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record