Guthrie, J., Parker, L. D. and Dumay, J. (2015) Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(1), pp. 2-13. (doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2014-1871)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of published research access and peer review, considering their impacts on accounting scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on literature and publishing document review, experiential reflections and argument. Findings – The authors reveal changes in publishing formats and accessibility, the challenges of managing research quality and significance and the challenges of avoiding constraint and foreclosure of significant new knowledge and its effective dissemination. Research limitations/implications – This paper discusses the research and publishing community’s opening to new, flexible opportunities for knowledge creation and dissemination. Originality/value – The discussion challenges the status quo of traditional academic journal publication and points to an innovative future.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Parker, Professor Lee |
Authors: | Guthrie, J., Parker, L. D., and Dumay, J. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance |
Journal Name: | Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal |
Publisher: | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
ISSN: | 0951-3574 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record