Accounting's latent classicism: Revisiting Ccassical management origins

Parker, L. D. and Ritson, P. (2011) Accounting's latent classicism: Revisiting Ccassical management origins. Abacus, 47(2), pp. 234-265. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00340.x)

Abstract

The historical classical management roots of contemporary accounting are still embedded in theory and practice, but invariably unacknowledged. This paper revisits the discourses and philosophies of three leading management writers generally regarded as proponents of scientific and classical management: Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, and the longest standing advocate, Lyndall Urwick. The paper argues that traditionally Taylor has been regarded as the dominant influential figure on early management and later accounting theory, but that this reflects an inaccurate stereotyping that ignores the greater reflections in contemporary accounting of Fayol and Urwick. Their approaches to planning, control, and coordination, as well as their accounting and financial management philosophies are revisited. This examination aims to better recognize their contributions to the latent classicism that still pervades accounting thought and practice.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Parker, Professor Lee
• Authors: Parker, L. D., and Ritson, P.
• College/School: College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
• Journal Name: Abacus
• Publisher: Wiley
• ISSN: 0001-3072
• ISSN (Online): 1467-6281