Democracy, law and relationships of domination – a response to ‘can republicanism tame public health?'

Scott, P. (2016) Democracy, law and relationships of domination – a response to ‘can republicanism tame public health?'. Public Health Ethics, 9(2), pp. 134-135. (doi:10.1093/phe/phw023) (PMID:27551293)

[img]
Preview
Text
124317.pdf - Accepted Version

148kB

Abstract

This brief comment responds to some of the issues raised by Daniel Weinstock’s paper on the application of the republican ideal to public health. It considers the application outside of that specific context of both the problem Weinstock identifies and the solution he proposes. It queries, with reference to the different sorts of relationships of domination which exist, whether a republican approach to public health might not be better to seek to begin from private relationships of domination and to define its scope with reference to such relationships.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Scott, Mr Paul
Authors: Scott, P.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Public Health Ethics
Journal Abbr.:PHE
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1754-9973
ISSN (Online):1754-9981
Published Online:28 April 2016
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2016 The Author
First Published:First published in Public Health Ethics 9(2): 134-135
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record