Scott, P. (2016) Democracy, law and relationships of domination – a response to ‘can republicanism tame public health?'. Public Health Ethics, 9(2), pp. 134-135. (doi: 10.1093/phe/phw023) (PMID:27551293)
|
Text
124317.pdf - Accepted Version 148kB |
Abstract
This brief comment responds to some of the issues raised by Daniel Weinstock’s paper on the application of the republican ideal to public health. It considers the application outside of that specific context of both the problem Weinstock identifies and the solution he proposes. It queries, with reference to the different sorts of relationships of domination which exist, whether a republican approach to public health might not be better to seek to begin from private relationships of domination and to define its scope with reference to such relationships.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Scott, Mr Paul |
Authors: | Scott, P. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Journal Name: | Public Health Ethics |
Journal Abbr.: | PHE |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 1754-9973 |
ISSN (Online): | 1754-9981 |
Published Online: | 28 April 2016 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 The Author |
First Published: | First published in Public Health Ethics 9(2): 134-135 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record