Korteweg, A., Kräussl, R. and Verwijmeren, P. (2016) Does it pay to invest in art? A selection-corrected returns perspective. Review of Financial Studies, 29(4), pp. 1007-1038. (doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhv062)
|
Text
123152.pdf - Accepted Version 810kB |
Abstract
This paper shows the importance of correcting for sample selection when investing in illiquid assets that trade endogenously. Using a sample of 32,928 paintings that sold repeatedly between 1960 and 2013, we find an asymmetric V-shaped relation between sale probabilities and returns. Adjusting for the resulting selection bias reduces average annual index returns from 8.7% to 6.3%, lowers Sharpe ratios from 0.27 to 0.11, and materially impacts portfolio allocations. Investing in a broad portfolio of paintings is not attractive, but targeting specific styles or top-selling artists may add value. The methodology naturally extends to other asset classes.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Verwijmeren, Professor Patrick |
Authors: | Korteweg, A., Kräussl, R., and Verwijmeren, P. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance |
Journal Name: | Review of Financial Studies |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 0893-9454 |
ISSN (Online): | 1465-7368 |
Published Online: | 27 October 2015 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press |
First Published: | First published in Review of Financial Studies 29(4):1007-1038 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record