Taking health geography out of the academy: measuring academic impact

Shortt, N. K., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R. and Smith, K. E. (2016) Taking health geography out of the academy: measuring academic impact. Social Science and Medicine, 168, pp. 265-272. (doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.048)

120673.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.



In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an ‘impact agenda’. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20% of an academic unit of assessment’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of ‘research impact’ implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond ‘business as usual’ public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which ‘impact’ is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Mitchell, Professor Rich
Authors: Shortt, N. K., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R., and Smith, K. E.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Public Health
Journal Name:Social Science and Medicine
ISSN (Online):1873-5347
Published Online:29 June 2016
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2016 The Authors
First Published:First published in Social Science and Medicine 168: 265-272
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record