FNA, core biopsy, or both for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma: Obtaining sufficient tissue for a specific diagnosis and molecular testing

Coley, S. M., Crapanzano, J. P. and Saqi, A. (2015) FNA, core biopsy, or both for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma: Obtaining sufficient tissue for a specific diagnosis and molecular testing. Cancer Cytopathology, 123(5), pp. 318-326. (doi: 10.1002/cncy.21527) (PMID:25711901)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, minimally invasive procedures are performed to assess lung lesions and stage lung carcinomas. In cases of advanced-stage lung cancer, the biopsy may provide the only diagnostic tissue. The aim of this study was to determine which method—fine-needle aspiration (FNA), core biopsy (CBx), or both (B)—is optimal for providing sufficient tissue for rendering a specific diagnosis and pursuing molecular studies for guiding tumor-specific treatment. METHODS: A search was performed for computed tomography–guided lung FNA, CBx, or B cases with rapid onsite evaluation. Carcinomas were assessed for the adequacy to render a specific diagnosis; this was defined as enough refinement to subtype a primary carcinoma or to assess a metastatic origin morphologically and/or immunohistochemically. In cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma, the capability of each modality to yield sufficient tissue for molecular studies (epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS, or anaplastic lymphoma kinase) was also assessed. RESULTS: There were 210 cases, and 134 represented neoplasms, including 115 carcinomas. For carcinomas, a specific diagnosis was reached in 89% of FNA cases (33 of 37), 98% of CBx cases (43 of 44), and 100% of B cases (34 of 34). For primary lung adenocarcinomas, adequate tissue remained to perform molecular studies in 94% of FNA cases (16 of 17), 100% of CBx cases (19 of 19), and 86% of B cases (19 of 22). No statistical difference was found among the modalities for either reaching a specific diagnosis (p = .07, Fisher exact test) or providing sufficient tissue for molecular studies (p = .30, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FNA, CBx, and B are comparable for arriving at a specific diagnosis and having sufficient tissue for molecular studies: they specifically attained the diagnostic and prognostic goals of minimally invasive procedures for lung carcinoma.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Coley, Dr Shana
Authors: Coley, S. M., Crapanzano, J. P., and Saqi, A.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Infection & Immunity
Journal Name:Cancer Cytopathology
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:1934-662X
ISSN (Online):1934-6638

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record