Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory

Hastings, A. , Bailey, N. , Gannon, M., Besemer, K. and Bramley, G. (2015) Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. Local Government Studies, 41(4), pp. 601-621. (doi: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1036987)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.


The scale of the cuts to local government finance, coupled with increasing demand for services, has led to unprecedented ‘budget gaps’ in council budgets. Arguably, two competing narratives of the trajectory of local government have emerged in which contrasting futures are imagined for the sector – a positive story of adaptation and survival and more negative one of residualisation and marginalisation. Drawing on case study evidence from three English local authorities, the paper distinguishes and provides examples of three strategic approaches to managing austerity – efficiency, retrenchment and investment. It demonstrates how and why the balance of these strategies has shifted between the early and later phases of austerity and considers the extent to which the evidence of the case studies provide support for either the survival or marginalisation narrative. The paper concludes by arguing that a third narrative – responsibilisation – captures more fully the trajectory of local government in England.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Bailey, Professor Nick and Hastings, Professor Annette and Gannon, Ms Maria
Authors: Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Besemer, K., and Bramley, G.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies
Journal Name:Local Government Studies
Publisher:Taylor and Francis
ISSN (Online):1743-9388

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record