Homo economicus in a big society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments

Matthews, P., Bramley, G. and Hastings, A. (2015) Homo economicus in a big society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments. Housing, Theory and Society, 32(1), pp. 54-72. (doi:10.1080/14036096.2014.947173)

Matthews, P., Bramley, G. and Hastings, A. (2015) Homo economicus in a big society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments. Housing, Theory and Society, 32(1), pp. 54-72. (doi:10.1080/14036096.2014.947173)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Problems of housing supply and affordability in England have long been recognized by policy-makers. A key barrier to supply is seen to be community activism by so-called not-in-my-back-yard activists (NIMBYs). The localism policy agenda, or devolving decision-making down to the local level, is central to how the UK coalition government seek to overcome this opposition. This conceives NIMBYism as a demonstration of homo economicus – of the rationality of economic beings seeking to maximize their utility. In this view, residents would not accept large urban extensions in suburban areas because they took on localized costs with no obvious benefits, unless incentivised appropriately. In this paper, we use analysis of British Social Attitudes Survey data as well as the results of the first review of middle-class activism in relation to public services to identify the likelihood of residents being incentivized by this version of localism to accept new housing. We conclude that the evidence on the individual and collective attitudes suggests that it is unlikely that localism will deliver new housing. Importantly, the political power of affluent and professional groups means they can ensure that their opposition is heard, particularly in the neighbourhood plans delivered through localism. The paper argues that planning for housing needs to understand communities as homo democraticus – as actively engaged in negotiating between complex interests with respect to support for new housing.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Hastings, Professor Annette and Bramley, Prof Glen
Authors: Matthews, P., Bramley, G., and Hastings, A.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies
Journal Name:Housing, Theory and Society
Publisher:Routledge
ISSN:1403-6096
ISSN (Online):1651-2278

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record