Riddell, S., Adler, M., Mordaunt, E. and Farmakopoulou, N. (2000) Special educational needs and competing policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 15(6), pp. 621-635. (doi: 10.1080/02680930010000227)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930010000227
Abstract
This paper explores a range of policy frameworks in play in the field of special educational needs and their relationship with procedural fairness and substantive justice. Drawing on analysis of post-1993 English and Scottish policy documents, dominant motifs in special educational needs policy are identified. It is argued that in both England and Scotland, there is a shift away from a policy framework based on professional control. Legal and bureaucratic policy frameworks are of growing importance in both countries, but change has been more rapid in England. Finally, the implications of comparative research for special educational needs policy and wider education policy are discussed.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Mordaunt, Dr Enid |
Authors: | Riddell, S., Adler, M., Mordaunt, E., and Farmakopoulou, N. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Journal Name: | Journal of Education Policy |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
ISSN: | 0268-0939 |
ISSN (Online): | 1464-5106 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record