EC maritime transport law and policy

McMahon, J. and Greaves, R. (2007) EC maritime transport law and policy. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56(2), pp. 415-421. (doi:10.1093/iclq/lei170)

92576.pdf - Published Version



Maritime transport is by its very nature an international mode of transport regulated by a large number of international treaties and conventions, most of them negotiated and concluded within the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Members of the international community, including some EU Member States themselves, were initially reluctant to transfer their sovereignty in this field of transport to the Community. However, two main events gradually changed the attitude of the Member States to the Community's competence to regulate this mode of transport. First, the mid-1980s impetus to establish an internal market by 1992 placed all modes of transport at the centre of the project. It was not feasible to establish a geographical market, stretching from the Atlantic to the Eastern European countries and from the North Sea to the Mediterranean, where goods, people, services and capital would be able to circulate freely, and in a competitive manner, without the Community seriously addressing transport issues. Thus, unsurprisingly, a number of important legislative proposals affecting the provisions of maritime transport services were adopted and implemented during that period. The second significant factor in the development of a maritime transport policy was the number of serious marine accidents which took place in the Community's coastal waters during the last 20 years.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Greaves, Professor Rosa
Authors: McMahon, J., and Greaves, R.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN (Online):1471-6895
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2007 British Institute of International and Comparative Law
First Published:First published in International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56(2):415-421
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record