Restitution of art and cultural objects and its limits

Roodt, C. (2013) Restitution of art and cultural objects and its limits. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 46, pp. 286-307.

Roodt, C. (2013) Restitution of art and cultural objects and its limits. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 46, pp. 286-307.

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Art and cultural objects have a complex nature and status. A legal approach cannot escape having to state which objects come within the scope of the definition, but an objective legal definition in abstracto is difficult to provide. Both the legitimate and the underground art markets are implicated in the trade involving these objects. Global legal diversity further complicates the distinction between the licit and the illicit trade. This article takes stock of restitution and suitable dispute settlement mechanisms against this backdrop. Restitution processes have become more openly policy-oriented, and the meaning of 'restitution' now extends to overcoming the legal obstacles in the way of return. Law can provide the framework for negotiation and dispute settlement in many cases, but the ethical dimension is a particularly powerful agent for restitution of Nazi spoliated art and human remains.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Roodt, Dr Hendrika Christ
Authors: Roodt, C.
College/School:College of Arts > School of Culture and Creative Arts
Journal Name:Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa
Journal Abbr.:CILSA
Publisher:University of South Africa
ISSN:0010-4051
Related URLs:

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record