Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence: a qualitative exploration

Neale, J., Nettleton, S. and Pickering, L. (2014) Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence: a qualitative exploration. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(1), pp. 3-12. (doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.002)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.


Background: In recent years, ‘recovery’ has become a central, yet controversial, concept within the international drug and alcohol field. This paper explores gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence with reference to gender theory, the existing literature on women and drugs, and the concept of recovery capital.

Methods: Data were generated from 77 qualitative interviews conducted with 40 current or ex-heroin users (21 men and 19 women). Coded data were analysed using framework and key themes were mapped onto the four components of recovery capital: social capital, physical capital, human capital, and cultural capital. Differences between the views and experiences of male and female participants were then explored.

Results: Participants had limited social, physical and human capital but greater cultural resources. Although women reported more physical and sexual abuse than the men, they had better family and social relationships and more access to informal support, including material assistance and housing. Women also seemed to be better at managing money and more concerned with their physical appearance. Despite the salience of gender, individuals had diverse recovery resources that reflected a complex mix of intrapersonal, interpersonal and structural factors.

Conclusions: Findings are consistent with increasing feminist interest in intersectionality and contribute to a more gender-sensitive understanding of recovery. Gender was an important structure in shaping our participants’ experiences, but there was no evidence of an ‘essential’ female recovery experience and women did not necessarily have less recovery resources than men. Whilst useful, the concept of recovery capital has a number of definitional and conceptual limitations that indicate a need for more empirical research to improve its utility in policy and practice.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Pickering, Dr Lucy and Neale, Prof Joanne
Authors: Neale, J., Nettleton, S., and Pickering, L.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Social Scientists working in Health and Wellbeing
College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Sociology Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences
Journal Name:International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher:Elsevier BV
ISSN (Online):1873-4758

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record