Cockshott, P. (2013) Heinrich's idea of abstract labour. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 41(2), pp. 287-297. (doi: 10.1080/03017605.2013.805004)[Book Review]
|
Text
83970.pdf - Accepted Version 210kB |
Abstract
The article reviews Heinrich’s An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. It questions three main features of Heinrich’s work: its defence of teleology, its view that no empirical proof is needed of the labour theory of value and its particular monetary interpretation of the theory of value. This approach, it argues, is anti-scientific.
Item Type: | Book Reviews |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Critique: A Journal of Socialist Theory 41(2):287-297 30 July 2013 copyright Taylor and Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03017605.2013.805004 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Cockshott, Dr William |
Authors: | Cockshott, P. |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Computing Science |
Journal Name: | Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
ISSN: | 0301-7605 |
ISSN (Online): | 1748-8605 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2013 Critique |
First Published: | First published in Critique: A Journal of Socialist Theory 41(2):287-297 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record