Blameless wrongdoing and agglomeration: a response to Streumer

Brown, C. (2005) Blameless wrongdoing and agglomeration: a response to Streumer. Utilitas, 17(2), pp. 222-225. (doi: 10.1017/S0953820805001536)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Bart Streumer argues that a certain variety of consequentialism – he calls it ‘semi-global consequentialism’ – is false on account of its falsely implying the possibility of ‘blameless wrongdoing’. This article shows (i) that Streumer's argument is nothing new; (ii) that his presentation of the argument is misleading, since it suppresses a crucial premiss, commonly called ‘agglomeration’; and (iii) that, for all Streumer says, the proponent of semi-global consequentialism may easily resist his argument by rejecting agglomeration.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Brown, Dr Campbell
Authors: Brown, C.
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Journal Name:Utilitas
ISSN:0953-8208
Published Online:15 June 2005

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record