Brown, C. (2005) Blameless wrongdoing and agglomeration: a response to Streumer. Utilitas, 17(2), pp. 222-225. (doi: 10.1017/S0953820805001536)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Bart Streumer argues that a certain variety of consequentialism – he calls it ‘semi-global consequentialism’ – is false on account of its falsely implying the possibility of ‘blameless wrongdoing’. This article shows (i) that Streumer's argument is nothing new; (ii) that his presentation of the argument is misleading, since it suppresses a crucial premiss, commonly called ‘agglomeration’; and (iii) that, for all Streumer says, the proponent of semi-global consequentialism may easily resist his argument by rejecting agglomeration.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Brown, Dr Campbell |
Authors: | Brown, C. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | Utilitas |
ISSN: | 0953-8208 |
Published Online: | 15 June 2005 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record