Smith, C. (2006) Adam Ferguson and the danger of books. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 4(2), pp. 93-109. (doi: 10.3366/jsp.2006.4.2.93)
|
Text
74816.pdf 140kB |
Abstract
Throughout his career Adam Ferguson made a series of conservative political pronouncements on contemporary events.This paper treats these pronouncements as having a solid basis in his social theory and examines his place in the conceptual development of the tradition of British conservatism.It examines Ferguson's distinction between two forms of human knowledge: book learning of abstract science acquired from formal education and capacity acquired from practical experience in real affairs. Ferguson's empiricism leads to a series of sustained warnings against the danger of excessive abstraction to the pursuit of science and these concerns are extended into the social and political realm as he cautions against reliance on abstract philosophy and defends the superiority of practical politicians.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Smith, Professor Craig |
Authors: | Smith, C. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences |
Journal Name: | Journal of Scottish Philosophy |
Publisher: | Edinburgh University Press |
ISSN: | 1479-6651 |
ISSN (Online): | 1755-2001 |
Published Online: | 01 September 2006 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2006 Edinburgh University Press |
First Published: | First published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4(2):93-109 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record