When states die: geographic and territorial pathways to state death

Valeriano, B. and Van Benthuysen, J. (2012) When states die: geographic and territorial pathways to state death. Third World Quarterly, 33(7), pp. 1165-1189. (doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.691826)

Abstract

State death, understood as the formal loss of control over foreign policy, is an important but neglected issue in the international relations literature. When do states die and why? How do states exit the system? The consequences of state death can be wide-ranging, from forced migration movements, regional instability, to general famine. Despite these severe consequences, political scientists have yet to adequately study the causes of state death. Fazal finds that states are prone to death when they are located as a buffer between two rivals; this suggests that being a buffer state is a cause of state death. Our expansion of current research seeks to add the concept of territorial disputes to the state death literature. We suggest that states are at greater risk of death when they become involved in territorial disputes that raise the stakes of conflict. The resulting research demonstrates that a reliable predictor of state death is engagement in a territorial dispute. Territorial disputes are the most prevalent issue that leads to war and can also be a leading cause of state death.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Valeriano, Dr Brandon
• Authors: Valeriano, B., and Van Benthuysen, J.
• College/School: College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
• Journal Name: Third World Quarterly
• Publisher: Routledge
• ISSN: 0143-6597
• Published Online: 05 July 2012