Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion

Downward, P., Finch, J.H. and Ramsay, J. (2002) Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(4), pp. 481-500. (doi:10.1093/cje/26.4.481)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

This paper reviews the critical realist critique of the methods of analysis adopted in neoclassical research and argues that there is scope for clearer guidance for economics researchers who wish to pursue empirical research in the critical realist tradition. It is argued that critical realist epistemology, derived from its open‐systems ontology, is unnecessarily dismissive in rejecting research methods that draw inferences from stable empirical regularities and patterns. The argument draws upon Keynes's philosophical explanations of decision‐making and probability, on behavioural and institutional explanations of emerging and stable institutions, and on inductive research techniques such as grounded theory, to establish a role for a plurality of quantitative and qualitative approaches to critical realist research.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Finch, Professor John
Authors: Downward, P., Finch, J.H., and Ramsay, J.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:Cambridge Journal of Economics
ISSN:0309-166X
ISSN (Online):1464-3545

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record