Pathways to interstate war: a qualitative comparative analysis of the steps to war theory

Valeriano, B. and Marin, V. (2010) Pathways to interstate war: a qualitative comparative analysis of the steps to war theory. Josef Korbel Journal of Advanced International Studies, 2, pp. 1-27.

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Publisher's URL: http://www.du.edu/korbel/jais/

Abstract

The steps-to-war theory (Vasquez 1993) suggests that war is brought on by a series of steps that increase hostility and then make the issues under contention more intractable. Power politics strategies, including coercion in the face of territorial disputes, rivalry, hardliners in power, alliances, and arms races, are all important steps to war. This paper utilizes the steps-to-war theory using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). With this method, we can observe differing pathways to war, rather than the correlations associated with war. This research also represents the first attempt to classify domestic leaders according to type as suggested by existing theory. Territorial issues, rivalry, hardliners in power, and alliances are all sufficient conditions for the existence of an interstate war.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Valeriano, Dr Brandon
Authors: Valeriano, B., and Marin, V.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Josef Korbel Journal of Advanced International Studies

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record