Cosmogenic surface exposure dating the last deglaciation in Denmark: discrepancies with independent age constraints suggest delayed periglacial landform stabilization

Houmark-Nielsen, M., Linge, H., Fabel, D. , Schnabel, C., Xu, S., Wilchen, K.M. and Binnie, S. (2012) Cosmogenic surface exposure dating the last deglaciation in Denmark: discrepancies with independent age constraints suggest delayed periglacial landform stabilization. Quaternary Geochronology, 13, pp. 1-17. (doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2012.08.006)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Cosmogenic nuclide surface exposure ages are determined from in situ10Be and 36Cl analysis of 38 rock surfaces found in different glacial landforms in Denmark. Dating of erratic boulders and adjacent ice-sculpted bedrock on the island of Bornholm in the western Baltic Sea reveals almost identical values. This suggests that little if any inherited nuclides are present in the sampled boulders. West of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) ice margin in Denmark ages reflect exposure from the Middle Weichselian. East of the LGM margin exposure ages from 35 samples show Late Weichselian ages in a range between 20.6 - 11.9 ka. To test to what extent these dates reflect the onset of deglaciation immediately after cessation of active glacier flow, surface exposure ages are evaluated against independent chronologies of Late Weichselian ice-sheet fluctuations in southwestern Scandinavia. The Bornholm dates agree with the independent age model, however, in the data set for eastern Denmark only less than half the surface exposure ages lie within the expected age envelope. This apparent mismatch is most likely due to post-glaciation shielding and delayed surface stabilisation compared to the timing of ice-margin retreat. Thus ages from boulders resting in dead-ice moraines and mass wasting landscapes underestimate deglaciation by 3-6 thousand years. The results quantify the impact of exhumation and landform stabilisation on cosmogenic surface exposure ages on millennial scales. We conclude, that interpretation of cosmogenic exposure ages should include careful evaluation of possible post-depositional landform transformation in attempts to fine tune ages of e.g. end moraine features. With reference to independent age models we critically evaluate glacier advance – retreat scenarios from regions around the southern Baltic that alone are based on weighted average ages of cosmogenic exposure dating.

Item Type:Articles
Keywords:In situ cosmogenic 10Be and 36Cl; Surface exposure dating; Erratic boulders and bedrock; Landform dependence; Denmark
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Fabel, Dr Derek and Schnabel, Dr Christoph and Xu, Dr Sheng
Authors: Houmark-Nielsen, M., Linge, H., Fabel, D., Schnabel, C., Xu, S., Wilchen, K.M., and Binnie, S.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences > Geography
College of Science and Engineering > Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre
Research Group:ESRG
Journal Name:Quaternary Geochronology
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1871-1014
Published Online:10 September 2012

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record