Clinical guidelines contribute to the health inequities experienced by individuals with intellectual disabilities

Mizen, L.A.M., Macfie, M.L., Findlay, L., Cooper, S.-A. and Melville, C. (2012) Clinical guidelines contribute to the health inequities experienced by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Implementation Science, 7(May), p. 42. (doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-42)

Mizen, L.A.M., Macfie, M.L., Findlay, L., Cooper, S.-A. and Melville, C. (2012) Clinical guidelines contribute to the health inequities experienced by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Implementation Science, 7(May), p. 42. (doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-42)

[img] Text
64475_.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

180kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-42

Abstract

<p><b>Background:</b> Clinical practice guidelines are developed to improve the quality of healthcare. However, clinical guidelines may contribute to health inequities experienced by disadvantaged groups. This study uses an equity lens developed by the International Clinical Epidemiology Network (INCLEN) to examine how well clinical guidelines address inequities experienced by individuals with intellectual disabilities.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Nine health problems relevant to the health inequities experienced by persons with intellectual disabilities were selected. Clinical guidelines on these disorders were identified from across the world. The INCLEN equity lens was used as the basis for a purposedesigned, semistructured data collection tool. Two raters independently examined each guideline and completed the data collection tool. The data extracted by each rater were discussed at a research group consensus conference and agreement was reached on a final equity lens rating for each guideline.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-six guidelines were identified, one of which (2.8%) explicitly excluded persons with intellectual disabilities. Of the remaining 35, six (17.1%) met the first criterion of the equity lens, identifying persons with intellectual disabilities at high risk for the specific health problem. Eight guidelines (22.9%) contained any content on intellectual disabilities. Six guidelines addressed the fourth equity lens criterion, by giving specific consideration to the barriers to implementation of the guideline in disadvantaged populations. There were no guidelines that addressed the second, third, and fifth equity lens criteria.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The equity lens is a useful tool to systematically examine whether clinical guidelines address the health needs and inequities experienced by disadvantaged groups. Clinical guidelines are likely to further widen the health inequities experienced by persons with intellectual disabilities, and other disadvantaged groups, by being preferentially advantageous to the general population. There is a need to systematically incorporate methods to consider disadvantaged population groups into the processes used to develop clinical guidelines.</p>

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Findlay, Dr Linda and Cooper, Professor Sally-Ann and Melville, Professor Craig
Authors: Mizen, L.A.M., Macfie, M.L., Findlay, L., Cooper, S.-A., and Melville, C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Journal Name:Implementation Science
ISSN:1748-5908
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2012 The Authors
First Published:First published in Implementation Science 7(May):42
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record