Chandler, J. and Rieger, A. (2011) Self-respect regained. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111(2pt2), pp. 311-318. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00311.x)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00311.x
Abstract
In a recent article, David Christensen casts aspersions on a restricted version of van Fraassen's Reflection principle, which he dubs ‘Self-Respect’(sr). Rejecting two possible arguments for sr, he concludes that the principle does not constitute a requirement of rationality. In this paper we argue that not only has Christensen failed to make a case against the aforementioned arguments, but that considerations pertaining to Moore's paradox indicate that sr, or at the very least a mild weakening thereof, is indeed a plausible normative principle.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Rieger, Dr Adam |
| Authors: | Chandler, J., and Rieger, A. |
| College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
| Journal Name: | Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society |
| ISSN: | 0066-7374 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1467-9264 |
| Published Online: | 12 December 2011 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Funder and Project Information
Funder and Project Information