Chacma baboon mating markets: competitor suppression mediates the potential for intersexual exchange

Clarke, P.M.R., Halliday, J. , Barrett, L. and Henzi, S.P. (2010) Chacma baboon mating markets: competitor suppression mediates the potential for intersexual exchange. Behavioral Ecology, 21(6), pp. 1211-1220. (doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq125)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Contrary to the expectations of biological market theory, in species where sexual coercion is effective males often exchange resources or services with females for the opportunity to mate. This suggests that an ability to control mating partners does not preclude the need for their cooperation. We argue that this is because, in many systems, female resistance to coercion can precipitate intermale competition and, as such, a male’s mating strategy may often be better served by securing female compli- ance through affiliative rather than agonistic means. Based on this reasoning, we predicted that the need for males to exchange resources/services for mating access with females will be absent only when intermale power differentials are such that dominant individuals can secure uncontested access to receptive females. Accordingly, data from our long-term study site revealed no support for a biological markets model of intersexual mating exchange in chacma baboons, where the mating monopolies of alpha males are near absolute. Specifically, we found that males groomed females substantially less than they were groomed by them, their propensity to groom was poorly described by measures of female fertility, male rank, and the operational sex ratio, and their mating success was not associated with their grooming effort. We further predicted that an additional consequence of the degree of competitor suppression seen in chacma would be a reversal in the direction of intersexual trade of services for mating. We found that female grooming was positively associated with the probability that they would successfully initiate a copulation. Our study strongly suggests that it is variance in competitor suppression, not partner control, that mediates the potential for and direction of intersexual cooperative exchange.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Halliday, Dr Jo
Authors: Clarke, P.M.R., Halliday, J., Barrett, L., and Henzi, S.P.
Subjects:Q Science > Q Science (General)
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
Journal Name:Behavioral Ecology
ISSN:1045-2249
Published Online:02 September 2010

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record