Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial

Dearnaley, D. et al. (2012) Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncology, 13(1), pp. 43-54. (doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70293-5)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

<p>Background: Prostate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity, implying a therapeutic advantage of hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned preliminary safety analysis of side-effects in stages 1 and 2 of a randomised trial comparing standard and hypofractionated radiotherapy.</p> <p>Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised study and recruited men with localised prostate cancer between Oct 18, 2002, and Aug 12, 2006, at 11 UK centres. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive conventional or hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radio therapy, and all were given with 3-6 months of neoadjuvant androgen suppression. Computer-generated random permuted blocks were used, with risk of seminal vesicle involvement and radiotherapy-treatment centre as stratification factors. The conventional schedule was 37 fractions of 2 Gy to a total of 74 Gy. The two hypofractionated schedules involved 3 Gy treatments given in either 20 fractions to a total of 60 Gy, or 19 fractions to a total of 57 Gy. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse toxicity at 2 years on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. The primary analysis included all patients who had received at least one fraction of radiotherapy and completed a 2 year assessment. Treatment allocation was not masked and clinicians were not blinded. Stage 3 of this trial completed the planned recruitment in June, 2011. This study is registered, number ISRCTN97182923.</p> <p>Findings: 153 men recruited to stages 1 and 2 were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment of 74 Gy, 153 to receive 60 Gy, and 151 to receive 57 Gy. With 50.5 months median follow-up (IQR 43.5-61.3), six (4.3%; 95% CI 1.6-9.2) of 138 men in the 74 Gy group had bowel toxicity of grade 2 or worse on the RTOG scale at 2 years, as did five (3.6%; 1.2-8.3) of 137 men in the 60 Gy group, and two (1.4%; 0.2-5.0) of 143 men in the 57 Gy group. For bladder toxicities, three (2.2%; 0.5-6.2) of 138 men, three (2.2%; 0.5-6.3) of 137, and none (0.0%; 97.5% CI 0.0-2.6) of 143 had scores of grade 2 or worse on the RTOG scale at 2 years.</p> <p>Interpretation: Hypofractionated high-dose radiotherapy seems equally well tolerated as conventionally fractionated treatment at 2 years.</p>

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Russell, Dr Martin
Authors: Dearnaley, D., Syndikus, I., Sumo, G., Bidmead, M., Bloomfield, D., Clark, C., Gao, A., Hassan, S., Horwich, A., Huddart, R., Khoo, V., Kirkbride, P., Mayles, H., Mayles, P., Naismith, O., Parker, C., Patterson, H., Russell, M., Scrase, C., South, C., Staffurth, J., and Hall, E.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Lancet Oncology
ISSN:1470-2045
Published Online:12 December 2011

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record