Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Both Russell and Frege were inclined to think that there is nothing essentially linguistic about thought: any actual reliance of ours upon language is a mere psychological contingency. If so then it should be possible to formulate logic in such a way that logical relationships are not represented or expressed as principles pertaining to linguistic forms. Russell and Frege take pains to achieve this, but fail. I explain this by looking at some features of Grundgesetz and Principia. Their failure, I suggest, is due to the nature of the case.
|Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:||Kemp, Dr Gary|
|College/School:||College of Arts > School of Humanities > Philosophy|
|Journal Name:||Pacific Philosophical Quarterly|
|Published Online:||17 December 2002|