Food security: perception failure

Subramanian, A., Kirwan, K. and Pink, D. (2010) Food security: perception failure. Science, 328(5975), p. 173. (doi:10.1126/science.328.5975.173-b)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.


Perception failure poses an imminent danger to the advancement of science. Consumer resistance to genetically modified (GM) products affects trade relations and reduces private research and development on plant biotechnology (1). A case in point is the recent rejection of GM eggplant in India, detailed in the News of the Week story by P. Bagla in the same issue (“After acrimonious debate, India rejects GM eggplant,” p. 767). GM technology is not new to India; Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton was first commercialized in India in 2002. Since then, about 5 million farmers have adopted the technology (2). Thus, negative experiences with GM crops cannot explain the rejection of Bt eggplant. Nor can regulation—India's highest biotechnology regulatory body, The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee, approved the Bt eggplant, deeming the technology safe (recounted in Bagla's News story). The major obstacle stemmed not from inadequate technology or strict regulations, but from the public's perception of the technology. Bridging the gap between science and society needs to be a high priority in order to put all currently available science to efficient use in addressing global food security concerns.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Subramanian, Dr Arjunan
Authors: Subramanian, A., Kirwan, K., and Pink, D.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Economics
Journal Name:Science
Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science
ISSN (Online):1095-9203
Published Online:01 January 2010

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record