Shaw, D. (2011) A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(2), pp. 123-125. (doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.039560)
|
Text
51791.pdf 69kB |
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.039560
Abstract
In two recent papers, Hugh McLachlan, Jacob Busch and Raffaele Rodogno have criticised my new perspective on euthanasia. Each paper analyses my argument and suggests two flaws. McLachlan identifies what he sees as important points regarding the justification of legal distinctions in the absence of corresponding moral differences and the professional role of the doctor. Busch and Rodogno target my criterion of brain life, arguing that it is a necessary but not sufficient condition and that it is not generalisable. In this paper I indicate flaws in all of these criticisms, and again suggest that my perspective does add something new to the debate.
Item Type: | Articles (Editorial) |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Shaw, Dr David |
Authors: | Shaw, D. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Dental School |
Journal Name: | Journal of Medical Ethics |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 0306-6800 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2011 BMJ Publishing Group |
First Published: | First published in Journal of Medical Ethics 37(2):123-125 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record