A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia

Shaw, D. (2011) A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(2), pp. 123-125. (doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.039560)

[img]
Preview
Text
51791.pdf

69kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.039560

Abstract

In two recent papers, Hugh McLachlan, Jacob Busch and Raffaele Rodogno have criticised my new perspective on euthanasia. Each paper analyses my argument and suggests two flaws. McLachlan identifies what he sees as important points regarding the justification of legal distinctions in the absence of corresponding moral differences and the professional role of the doctor. Busch and Rodogno target my criterion of brain life, arguing that it is a necessary but not sufficient condition and that it is not generalisable. In this paper I indicate flaws in all of these criticisms, and again suggest that my perspective does add something new to the debate.

Item Type:Articles (Editorial)
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Shaw, Dr David
Authors: Shaw, D.
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Dental School
Journal Name:Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher:BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN:0306-6800
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2011 BMJ Publishing Group
First Published:First published in Journal of Medical Ethics 37(2):123-125
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record