![[feed]](http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/style/images/feed-icon-14x14.png){kind=icon}
![[feed]](http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/style/images/twitter-logo.png){kind=logo}
Adam, A.K.M. (1996) Docetism, Käsemann, and Christology: Why historical criticism can't protect christological orthodoxy. Scottish Journal of Theology, 49 (04). pp. 391-410. ISSN 0036-9306 (doi:10.1017/S003693060004847X)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003693060004847X
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s): | Adam, Dr A K M |
| Authors: | Adam, A.K.M. |
| College/School: | College of Arts > School of Critical Studies > Theology and Religious Studies |
| Journal Name: | Scottish Journal of Theology |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| ISSN: | 0036-9306 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1475-3065 |
| Published Online: | 2009 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Tools
Tools