An empirical comparison of convertible bond valuation models

Zabolotnyuk, Y., Jones, R. and Veld, C. (2010) An empirical comparison of convertible bond valuation models. Financial Management, 39(2), pp. 675-706. (doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01088.x)

[img]
Preview
Text
48681.pdf

498kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01088.x

Abstract

This paper empirically compares three convertible bond valuation models. We use an innovative approach where all model parameters are estimated by the Marquardt algorithm using a subsample of convertible bond prices. The model parameters are then used for out-of-sample forecasts of convertible bond prices. The mean absolute deviation is 1.86% for the Ayache-Forsyth-Vetzal model, 1.94% for the Tsiveriotis-Fernandes model, and 3.73% for the Brennan-Schwartz model. For this and other measures of fit, the Ayache-Forsyth-Vetzal and Tsiveriotis-Fernandes models outperform the Brennan-Schwartz model.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Veld, Professor Chris
Authors: Zabolotnyuk, Y., Jones, R., and Veld, C.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HG Finance
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
Journal Name:Financial Management
Journal Abbr.:FM
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0046-3892
ISSN (Online):1755-053X
Published Online:22 June 2010
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2010 Financial Management Association International
First Published:First published in Financial Management 39(2):675-706
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record