Enlighten
Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow
home > services > Enlighten

Auditor independence and audit risk: a reconceptualisation

Fearnley, S., Beattie, V., and Brandt, R. (2005) Auditor independence and audit risk: a reconceptualisation. Journal of International Accounting Research, 4 (1). pp. 39-71. ISSN 1542-6297

[img]
Preview
Text
Audrisk21June_03.pdf

386Kb

Publisher's URL: http://www.atypon-link.com/AAA/toc/jiar/4/1)

Abstract

The principles-based U.K. regulatory framework for auditor independence (Chartered Accountants Joint Ethics Committee 1996), which was adopted in 1997, identifies threats to independence in fact, independence in appearance, and the safeguards that control these threats. These principles are incorporated in the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC 2001) ethics framework. Drawing on six case studies of interactions involving significant accounting issues between audit engagement partners and finance directors in U.K.-listed companies, we analyze the threats and safeguards to auditor independence in fact that are relevant to the outcome of each interaction. Despite the U.K.'s comprehensive regulatory framework for independence, audit quality control, and independent inspection of firms, not all the interactions have a fully compliant outcome. Independence in fact is compromised where the safeguards in the framework are insufficient defense against the threats, particularly regarding intimidation and bullying during the audit process. Further examples of existing threats are identified and additional threats emerge, in particular an urgency threat, and a loss of face threat. Management motivation is found to be a key driver of pressure. Threats to independence arising within audit firms are not recognized in the current U.K. audit risk model. An extended risk model incorporating within-firm risk is suggested. This study demonstrates the need for continual improvement to regulatory frameworks; in particular it supports the recent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule on improper influence on the conduct of audits (Securities and Exchange Commission 2003a).

Item Type:Article
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s):Beattie, Prof Vivien
Authors: Fearnley, S., Beattie, V., and Brandt, R.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
Journal Name:Journal of International Accounting Research
Publisher:American Accounting Association
ISSN:1542-6297
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2005 American Accounting Society
First Published:First published in Journal of International Accounting Research 4(1):39-71
Publisher Policy:Reproduced with the permission of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics