The British Accounting Review review process: evidence from 1997 to 2006

Beattie, V. and Emmanuel, C. (2008) The British Accounting Review review process: evidence from 1997 to 2006. British Accounting Review, 40(3), pp. 199-206. (doi:10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004)

[img]
Preview
Text
4633.pdf

311kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004

Abstract

This is the first part of a two-part analysis of submissions to The British Accounting Review (BAR) over the decade spanning 1997 to 2006. In this part, we outline the journal review process, report on selected characteristics (country of origin, number of authors) of 657 submitted papers and report on the review process outcomes of these papers (including turnaround times). In part two of this analysis, we will investigate the characteristics of these papers that give insights into the way in which accounting and finance knowledge has developed over the decade (in particular, the topic area and methods of analysis used).

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Beattie, Prof Vivien
Authors: Beattie, V., and Emmanuel, C.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
Journal Name:British Accounting Review
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0890-8398
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2008 Elsevier
First Published:First published in British Accounting Review 40(3):199-206
Publisher Policy:Reproduced with permission of the publisher.

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record