Lundberg, T.C. (2008) An opposing view of Scotland's ballot paper problem: Arbuthnott and the government had the right idea. Political Quarterly, 79(4), pp. 569-577. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00957.x)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
The May 2007 Scottish Parliament election used a different ballot format from the one used in the previous elections, one that combined the regional and constituency votes onto one ballot paper (two separate papers were used before). Because there were many more invalid votes in 2007, the problem was blamed on the two-vote ballot paper, which was recommended by the Arbuthnott Commission to prevent misunderstandings about what the two votes were for. Other places that use the mixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral system tend to use a two-vote ballot paper, with Germany and New Zealand seeing low levels of invalid votes. While the decision to revert to two separate papers in future Scottish Parliament elections might reduce the number of invalid votes, the price could be more confusion about the proportional nature of the electoral system unless public education improves significantly.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Lundberg, Dr Thomas |
| Authors: | Lundberg, T.C. |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN1187 Scotland |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics |
| Journal Name: | Political Quarterly |
| ISSN: | 0032-3179 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1467-923X |
| Published Online: | 11 December 2008 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric