The impact of flower-dwelling predators on host plant reproductive success

Higginson, A.D., Ruxton, G.D. and Skelhorn, J. (2010) The impact of flower-dwelling predators on host plant reproductive success. Oecologia, 164(2), pp. 411-421. (doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1681-6) (PMID:20563603)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Flowers attract insects and so are commonly exploited as foraging sites by sit-and-wait predators. Such predators can be costly to their host plant by consuming pollinators. However, sit-and-wait predators are often prey generalists that also consume plant antagonists such as herbivores, nectar robbers and granivores, so may also provide benefits to their host plant. Here we present a simple, but general, model that provides novel predictions about how costs and benefits interact in different ecological circumstances. The model predicts that the ecological conditions in which flower-dwelling predators are found can generate either net benefits to their host plants, net costs to their host plants, or can have no effect on the fitness of their host plants. The net effect is influenced by the relative densities of mutualists and antagonists. The flower-dwelling predator has a strong positive effect on the plant if both the pollinators and the granivores are at high density. Further, the range of density combinations that yield a positive net outcome for the plant increases if the performance of pollinators is negatively density dependent, if the predator is only moderately effective at influencing flower visitor rates by its potential prey, and if pollinators are very effective. If plants of a given species find themselves consistently in conditions where they benefit from the presence of a predator then we predict that natural selection could favour the evolution of plant traits that increase the likelihood of predator recruitment and retention, especially where plants are served by highly effective pollinators.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Skelhorn, Dr John and Higginson, Dr Andrew and Ruxton, Professor Graeme
Authors: Higginson, A.D., Ruxton, G.D., and Skelhorn, J.
Subjects:Q Science > QK Botany
Q Science > QL Zoology
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Oecologia
ISSN:0029-8549
ISSN (Online):1432-1939
Published Online:19 June 2010

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
467321Masquerade: critical testing of the ecology of disguise.Graeme RuxtonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/F002653/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
425751Causes of signam mimicry and its consequences for optimal investment in prey defencesGraeme RuxtonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/D010500/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
444821Predator-prey interactions and the evolution of prey aggregationGraeme RuxtonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/D010772/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
451771Optimal investment in costly anti-predator defencesGraeme RuxtonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/E016626/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED
467322Masquerade: critical testing of the ecology of disguise.Graeme RuxtonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/F002653/1RI BIODIVERSITY ANIMAL HEALTH & COMPMED