Mills, K. (2009) Vacillating on Darfur: responsibility to protect, to prosecute, or to feed? Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(4), pp. 532-559. (doi: 10.1163/187598509X12505800144990)
![[img]](https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
30463.pdf 226kB |
Abstract
The international community has responded to the crisis in Darfur in a seemingly haphazard manner. Yet, a closer examination reveals a complex normative environment where states must respond to three related, but sometimes conflicting, sets of human rights norms – the responsibility to protect, international criminal justice, and humanitarianism. Using competing theoretical explanations of state behavior – those based on self-interest and those based on norms – allows us to examine the relationship between these norms and map the international response to Darfur.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Constructivism, Darfur, Humanitarian Intervention, Humanitarianism, International Criminal Court, International Criminal Justice, Rationalism, Responsibility to Protect |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Mills, Dr Kurt |
| Authors: | Mills, K. |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JZ International relations J Political Science > JX International law |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics |
| Journal Name: | Global Responsibility to Protect |
| Publisher: | Brill (Martinus Nijhoff) |
| ISSN: | 1875-9858 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1875-984X |
| Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2009 Koninklijke Brill |
| First Published: | First published in Global Responsibility to Protect 1(4):532-559 |
| Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric