Evaluating the health effects of social interventions: is no evidence better than any evidence when controlled studies are unethical?

Thomson, H., Hoskins, R., Petticrew, M., Ogilvie, D., Craig, N., Quinn, T. and Lindsay, G. (2004) Evaluating the health effects of social interventions: is no evidence better than any evidence when controlled studies are unethical? British Medical Journal, 328(7434), pp. 282-285. (doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.282)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7434.282

Abstract

No abstract available.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Thomson, Dr Hilary and Petticrew, Dr Mark and Ogilvie, David
Authors: Thomson, H., Hoskins, R., Petticrew, M., Ogilvie, D., Craig, N., Quinn, T., and Lindsay, G.
Subjects:R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Centre for Population and Health Sciences
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:British Medical Journal
Journal Abbr.:BMJ
ISSN:0959-535X
ISSN (Online):1756-1833

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record