Thromboprophylaxis use in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: an international RAND appropriateness panel

Torrente, F. et al. (2022) Thromboprophylaxis use in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: an international RAND appropriateness panel. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, (doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac073) (PMID:35608932) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
272386.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

598kB

Abstract

Background and Aims: Thromboprophylaxis use in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is inconsistent. Current guidelines only support treating children with acute severe colitis with risk factors. We convened an international RAND panel to explore thromboprophylaxis in paediatric IBD inpatients in the context of new evidence. Methods: We convened a geographically diverse 14-person panel of paediatric gastroenterologists alongside supporting experts. An online survey was sent before an online meeting. Panellists were asked to rate the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised paediatric IBD patients via 27 scenarios of varying ages, gender, and phenotype, with and without thrombotic risk factors. Anonymised results were presented at the meeting. A second modified survey was distributed to all panellists present at the meeting. Results from the second survey constitute the RAND panel results. The validated RAND disagreement index defined disagreement when ≥ 1. Results: The combined outcome of thromboprophylaxis being considered appropriate until discharge and inappropriate to withhold was seen in 20 of 27 scenarios, including: all patients with new-onset acute severe colitis; all flares of known ulcerative colitis, irrespective of risk factors except in pre-pubescent patients with limited disease and no risk factors; and all Crohn’s patients with risk factors. Disagreement was seen in five scenarios regarding Crohn’s without risk factors, where outcomes were already uncertain. Conclusions: RAND panels are an established method to assess expert opinion in areas of limited evidence. This work therefore constitutes neither a guideline nor a consensus; however, the findings suggest a need to re-evaluate the role of thromboprophylaxis in future guidelines.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:RH is supported by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Fellowship. EB holds the Northbridge Financial Corporation Chair in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, a joint Hospital-University Chair between the University of Toronto, the Hospital for Sick Children, and the SickKids Foundation. DRM receives support through a Distinguished Clinical Research Chair in Pediatric IBD from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Hansen, Dr Richard
Authors: Torrente, F., Meade, S., Benchimol, E. I., de Ridder, L., Croft, N. M., Kammermeier, J., Mack, D. R., Klomberg, R. C.W., Turner, D., Wilson, D. C., Martín-de-Carpi, J., Bronsky, J., Dias, J. A., Walker, G., van Ommen, C. H., Powar, M. P., Burgess, N., Irving, P. M., Samaan, M. A., and Hansen, R.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1873-9946
ISSN (Online):1876-4479
Published Online:24 May 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Authors
First Published:First published in Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 2022
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record