What is the potential for plural ownership to support a more inclusive economy? A systematic review protocol

Tod, E. et al. (2022) What is the potential for plural ownership to support a more inclusive economy? A systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 11, 76. (doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01955-y)

[img] Text
2669579.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

Background: The world is facing an unprecedented systemic shock to population health, the economy and society due to the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As with most economic shocks, this is expected to disproportionately impact vulnerable groups in society such as those in poverty and those in precarious employment as well as marginalised groups such as women, the elderly, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups and those with health conditions. The current literature is rich in normative recommendations on plural ownership as a key building block of an inclusive economy rooted in communities and their needs. There is, however, a need for a rigorous synthesis of the available evidence on what impact (if any) plural ownership may potentially have on the inclusivity of the economy. This review seeks to synthesise and compare the available evidence across the three economic sectors (private, public and third). Methods: We will search eight bibliographic databases (Sociological abstracts, EBSCO Econlit, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), ProQuest Public Health, Web of Science, Research Papers in Economics (Repec) – EconPapers) from the earliest data available in each database until January 2021. Grey literature will be identified from Google (advanced), Google Scholar and 37 organisational websites identified as relevant to the research question. We will include comparative studies of plural ownership from high-income countries that report outcomes on access to opportunities, distribution of benefits, poverty, and discrimination. A bespoke search strategy will be used for each website to account for the heterogeneity in content and search capabilities and will be fully documented. A standardised data extraction template based on the Population-Intervention-Context-Outcome (PICO) template will be developed. We will assess the strength of evidence for different forms of economic ownership identified in relation to the impact of each on the four economic outcomes of interest, paying particular attention to the role of wider contextual factors as they emerge through the evidence. Discussion: The findings of this review are intended to inform policymaking at local, national and international level that prioritises and supports the development of different economic and business models. Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYH5A

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Cumbers, Professor Andrew and Shipton, Dr Deborah and McCartney, Professor Gerard
Authors: Tod, E., Shipton, D., McCartney, G., Sarica, S., Scobie, G., Parkinson, J., Bagnall, A.-M., Manley, J., Cumbers, A., Deas, S., and de le Vingne, J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Mental Health and Wellbeing
College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Sociology Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences
Journal Name:Systematic Reviews
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:2046-4053
ISSN (Online):2046-4053
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Authors
First Published:First published in Systematic Reviews 11: 76
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record