Implementing a One Health approach to rabies surveillance: lessons from integrated bite case management

Swedberg, C., Mazeri, S., Mellanby, R. J., Hampson, K. and Chng, N. R. (2022) Implementing a One Health approach to rabies surveillance: lessons from integrated bite case management. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases, 3, 829132. (doi: 10.3389/fitd.2022.829132)

[img] Text
269009.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

2MB

Abstract

As part of the ‘Zero by 30’ strategy to end human deaths from dog-mediated rabies by 2030, international organizations recommend a One Health framework that includes Integrated Bite Case Management (IBCM). However, little is understood about the implementation of IBCM in practice. This study aims to understand how IBCM is conceptualized, exploring how IBCM has been operationalized in different contexts, as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seventeen practitioners and researchers with international, national, and local expertise across Africa, Asia, and the Americas. Thematic analysis was undertaken using both inductive and deductive approaches. Four main themes were identified: 1) stakeholders’ and practitioners’ conceptualization of IBCM and its role in rabies elimination; 2) variation in how IBCM operates across different contexts; 3) barriers and facilitators of IBCM implementation in relation to risk assessment, PEP provisioning, animal investigation, One Health collaboration, and data reporting; and 4) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on IBCM programs. This study highlights the diversity within experts’ conceptualization of IBCM, and its operationalization. The range of perspectives revealed that there are different ways of organizing IBCM within health systems and it is not a one-size-fits-all approach. The issue of sustainability remains the greatest challenge to implementation. Contextual features of each location influenced the delivery and the potential impact of IBCM. Programs spanned from highly endemic settings with limited access to PEP charged to the patient, to low endemicity settings with a large patient load associated with free PEP policies and sensitization. In practice, IBCM was tailored to meet the demands of the local context and level of rabies control. Thus, experts’ experiences did not necessarily translate across contexts, affecting perceptions about the function, motivation for, and implementation of IBCM. To design and implement future and current programs, guidance should be provided for health workers receiving patients on assessing the history and signs of rabies in the biting animal. The study findings provide insights in relation to implementation of IBCM and how it can support programs aiming to reach the Zero by 30 goal.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Chng, Dr Nai Rui and Swedberg, Catherine and Hampson, Professor Katie
Authors: Swedberg, C., Mazeri, S., Mellanby, R. J., Hampson, K., and Chng, N. R.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
Publisher:Frontiers Media
ISSN:2673-7515
ISSN (Online):2673-7515
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 Swedberg, Mazeri, Mellanby, Hampson and Chng
First Published:First published in Frontiers in Tropical Diseases 3: 829132
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
301620The Science of Rabies EliminationKatie HampsonWellcome Trust (WELLCOTR)207569/Z/17/ZInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
302671SPEEDIERKatie HampsonMedical Research Council (MRC)MR/R025649/1Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine