Epidemiology of emergency ambulance service calls related to COVID-19 in Scotland: a national record linkage study

Fitzpatrick, D., Duncan, E. A. S., Moore, M., Best, C., Andreis, F., Esposito, M., Dobbie, R., Corfield, A. R. and Lowe, D. J. (2022) Epidemiology of emergency ambulance service calls related to COVID-19 in Scotland: a national record linkage study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 30, 9. (doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-00995-6) (PMID:35090527) (PMCID:PMC8795941)

[img] Text
266518.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has overwhelmed health services across the world; its global death toll has exceeded 5.3 million and continues to grow. There have been almost 15 million cases of COVID-19 in the UK. The need for rapid accurate identification, appropriate clinical care and decision making, remains a priority for UK ambulance service. To support identification and conveyance decisions of patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms the Scottish Ambulance Service introduced the revised Medical Priority Dispatch System Protocol 36, enhanced physician led decision support and prehospital clinical guidelines. This study aimed to characterise the impact of these changes on the pathways and outcomes of people attended by the SAS) with potential COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective record linkage cohort study using National Data collected from NHS Scotland over a 5 month period (April–August 2020). Results: The SAS responded to 214,082 emergency calls during the study time period. The positive predictive value of the Protocol 36 to identify potentially COVID-19 positive patients was low (17%). Approximately 60% of those identified by Protocol 36 as potentially COVID-19 positive were conveyed. The relationship between conveyance and mortality differed between Protocol 36 Covid-19 positive calls and those that were not. In those identified by Protocol 36 as Covid-19 negative, 30 day mortality was higher in those not conveyed (not conveyed 9.2%; conveyed 6.6%) but in the Protocol 36 Covid-19 positive calls, mortality was higher in those conveyed (not conveyed 4.3% conveyed 8.8%). Thirty-day mortality rates of those with COVID-19 diagnosed through virology was between 28.8 and 30.2%. Conclusion: The low positive predictive value (17%) of Protocol 36 in identifying potential COVID-19 in patients emphasises the importance of ambulance clinicians approaching each call as involving COVID-19, reinforcing the importance of adhering to existing policy and continued use of PPE at all calls. The non-conveyance rate of people that were categorised as COVID-19 negative was higher than in the preceding year in the same service. The reasons for the higher rates of non-conveyance and the relationship between non conveyance rates and death at 3 and 30 days post index call are unknown and would benefit from further study.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Funding: This study was funded via the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Ofces’ Rapid Covid Call: COV/STG/20/02.
Keywords:Humans, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Ambulances, Scotland, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Lowe, Dr David
Authors: Fitzpatrick, D., Duncan, E. A. S., Moore, M., Best, C., Andreis, F., Esposito, M., Dobbie, R., Corfield, A. R., and Lowe, D. J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:1757-7241
ISSN (Online):1757-7241
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)
First Published:First published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 30:9
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record