Economics for people and planet – moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm

Brand-Correa, L., Brook, A., Büchs, M., Meier, P. , Naik, Y. and O’Neill, D. W. (2022) Economics for people and planet – moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm. Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), E371-E379. (doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00063-8) (PMID:35397225)

[img] Text
266155.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.



Despite substantial attention within the fields of public and planetary health on developing an economic system that benefits both people's health and the environment, heterodox economic schools of thought have received little attention within these fields. Ecological economics is a school of thought with particular relevance to public and planetary health. In this article, we discuss implications of key ecological economics ideas for public and planetary health, especially those related to critiques of gross domestic product as a measure of progress and economic growth as the dominant goal for economic and policy decision making. We suggest that ecological economics aligns well with public health goals, including concern for equality and redistribution. Ecological economics offers an opportunity to make the transition to an economic system that is designed to promote human and planetary health from the outset, rather than one where social and environmental externalities must be constantly corrected after the fact. Important ideas from ecological economics include the use of a multidimensional framework to evaluate economic and social performance, the prioritisation of wellbeing and environmental goals in decision making, policy design and evaluation that take complex relationships into account, and the role of provisioning systems (the physical and social systems that link resource use and social outcomes). We discuss possible interventions at the national scale that could promote public health and that align with the prioritisation of social and ecological objectives, including universal basic income or services and sovereign money creation. Overall, we lay the foundations for additional integration of ecological economics principles and pluralist economic thinking into public and planetary health scholarship and practice.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:LB-C was partly supported by the Living Well Within Limits Research Leadership Award funded by the Leverhulme Trust (RL2016–048). PM was partly funded by UK Medical Research Council grants (MR/S037578/1 and MC_UU_00022/5) and a Scotland Chief Scientist Office Grant (SPHSU 20).
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Meier, Professor Petra
Authors: Brand-Correa, L., Brook, A., Büchs, M., Meier, P., Naik, Y., and O’Neill, D. W.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:Lancet Planetary Health
ISSN (Online):2542-5196
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Author(s).
First Published:First published in Lancet Planetary Health 6(4):E371-E379
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
3048231Systems science research in public healthPetra MeierMedical Research Council (MRC)MC_UU_00022/5HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
3048231Systems science research in public healthPetra MeierChief Scientist Office (CSO)SPHSU20HW - MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit