1. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol.
(2009) 5:374–81. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.106
2. McEwen BS. The brain on stress: toward an integrative approach
to brain, body, and behavior. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2013) 8:673–5.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613506907
3. de Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to
disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2005) 6:463–75. doi: 10.1038/nrn1683
4. Kazlauskas E. Challenges for providing health care in traumatized
populations: barriers for PTSD treatments and the need for
new developments. Glob Health Action. (2017) 10:1322399.
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1322399
5. Yehuda R, Hoge CW, McFarlane AC, Vermetten E, Lanius RA, Nievergelt
CM, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2015)
1:15057. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.57
6. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic
stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry.
(1995) 52:1048–60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012
7. Kessler RC. Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to
society. J Clin Psychiatry. (2000) 61(Suppl. 5):4. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v61n0713e
8. Kalisch R, Baker DG, Basten U, Boks MP, Bonanno GA, Brummelman
E, et al. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related
disorders. Nat Hum Behav. (2017) 1:784–90. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-
0200-8
9. Pitman RK, Rasmusson AM, Koenen KC, Shin LM, Orr SP, Gilbertson MW,
et al. Biological studies of post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci.
(2012) 13:769–87. doi: 10.1038/nrn3339
10. Hirschtritt ME, Insel TR. Digital technologies in psychiatry: present and
future. Focus. (2018) 16:251. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20180001
11. Doherty K, Balaskas A, Doherty G. The design of ecological momentary
assessment technologies. Interact Comput. (2020) 32:257–278.
doi: 10.1093/iwcomp/iwaa019
12. Mohr DC, Burns MN, Schueller SM, Clarke G, Klinkman M. Behavioral
Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for
future research in mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2013) 35:332–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008
13. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA. Psychometric
properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther. (1996) 34:669–73.
doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00033-2
14. Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, et al.
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): development
and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess.
(2018) 30:383–95. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486
15. Lorenz P, Schindler L, Steudte-Schmiedgen S, Weidner K, Kirschbaum
C, Schellong J. Ecological momentary assessment in posttraumatic stress
disorder and coping. An eHealth study protocol. Eur J Psychotraumatol.
(2019) 10:1654064. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1654064
16. McDevitt-Murphy ME, Luciano MT, Zakarian RJ. Use of ecological
momentary assessment and intervention in treatment with adults. Focus.
(2018) 16:370–375. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20180017
17. Balaskas A, Schueller SM, Cox AL, Doherty G. Ecological momentary
interventions for mental health: a scoping review. PLoS ONE. (2021)
16:e0248152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248152
18. Schueller SM, Aguilera A, Mohr DC. Ecological momentary interventions
for depression and anxiety. Depress Anxiety. (2017) 34:540–545.
doi: 10.1002/da.22649
19. Utami D, Bickmore T, Nikolopoulou A, Paasche-Orlow M. Talk about death:
end of life planning with a virtual agent. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. (2017)
10498:441–50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_55
20. Lucas GM, Rizzo A, Gratch J, Scherer S, Stratou G, Boberg J, et al. Reporting
mental health symptoms: breaking down barriers to care with virtual human
interviewers. Front Rob AI. (2017) 4:51. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2017.00051
21. Rizzo A, Lange B, Buckwalter JG, Forbell E, Kim J, Sagae K, et al.
SimCoach: an intelligent virtual human system for providing healthcare
information and support. Int J Disabil Human Dev. (2011) 10:277–81.
doi: 10.1515/IJDHD.2011.046
22. Scherer S, Lucas GM, Gratch J, Skip Rizzo A, Morency L. Self-Reported
symptoms of depression and PTSD are associated with reduced vowel
space in screening interviews. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. (2016) 7:59–73.
doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2440264
23. Rizzo AS, Shilling R. Clinical virtual reality tools to advance the prevention,
assessment, and treatment of PTSD. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2017) 8(Suppl.
5): 1414560. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1414560
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org 6 February 2022 | Volume 12 | Article 752874
Laban et al. Social Robots for Supporting PTSD
24. Kothgassner OD, Goreis A, Kafka JX, Van Eickels RL, Plener PL,
Felnhofer A. Virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress
disorder (PTSD): a meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2019) 10:1654782.
doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1654782
25. Breazeal C. Toward sociable robots. Rob Auton Syst. (2003) 42:167–75.
doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1
26. Henschel A, Laban G, Cross ES. What makes a robot social? A
review of social robots from science fiction to a home or hospital
near you. Curr Rob Rep. (2021) 2:9–19. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00
035-0
27. Cifuentes CA, Pinto MJ, Céspedes N, Múnera M. Social robots in therapy
and care. Curr Rob Rep. (2020) 1:59–74. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00009-2
28. Robinson NL, Cottier TV, Kavanagh DJ. Psychosocial health interventions
by social robots: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med
Internet Res. (2019) 21:1–20. doi: 10.2196/13203
29. Scoglio AAJ, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, Drebing CE. Use of social robots in
mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res.
(2019) 21:e13322. doi: 10.2196/13322
30. Mohebbi A. Human-robot interaction in rehabilitation and assistance: a
review. Curr Rob Rep. (2020) 1:131–44. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00015-4
31. Feingold Polak R, Tzedek SL. Social robot for rehabilitation: expert clinicians
and post-stroke patients’ evaluation following a long-term intervention. In:
Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction. HRI ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing
Machinery (2020). p. 151–60.
32. Cross ES, Ramsey R, Liepelt R, Prinz W, de C Hamilton F A. The
shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human
animacy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci. (2016) 371:20150075.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0075
33. Cross ES, Hortensius R, Wykowska A. From social brains to social robots:
applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R
Soc B. (2019) 374:20180024. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0024
34. Laban G, George JN, Morrison V, Cross ES. Tell me more! Assessing
interactions with social robots from speech. Paladyn J Behav Rob. (2021)
12:136–59. doi: 10.1515/pjbr-2021-0011
35. Hortensius R, Hekele F, Cross ES. The perception of emotion
in artificial agents. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. (2018) 10:852–64.
doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2018.2826921
36. Ben-Zion Z, Fine NB, Keynan NJ, Admon R, Halpern P, Liberzon
I, et al. Neurobehavioral moderators of post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) trajectories: study protocol of a prospective MRI study of
recent trauma survivors. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2019) 10:1683941.
doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1683941
37. Ben-Zion Z, Artzi M, Niry D, Keynan NJ, Zeevi Y, Admon
R, et al. Neuroanatomical risk factors for posttraumatic stress
disorder in recent trauma survivors. Biol Psychiatry. (2020) 5:311–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.003
38. Bauer MR, Ruef AM, Pineles SL, Japuntich SJ, Macklin ML, Lasko NB,
et al. Psychophysiological assessment of PTSD: a potential research domain
criteria construct. Psychol Assess. (2013) 25:1037–43. doi: 10.1037/a0033432
39. Hirshberg A, Holcomb JB, Mattox KL. Hospital trauma care in multiplecasualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg Med. (2001) 37:647–52.
doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115650
40. Georgiou A, Lockey DJ. The performance and assessment of hospital
trauma teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. (2010) 18:66.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-66
41. Berger W, Mendlowicz MV, Marques-Portella C, Kinrys G,
Fontenelle LF, Marmar CR, et al. Pharmacologic alternatives to
antidepressants in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.
Progress Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2009) 33:169–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.12.004
42. Cusack K, Jonas DE, Forneris CA, Wines C, Sonis J, Middleton JC, et al.
Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. (2016) 43:128–41.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.10.003
43. Qi W, Gevonden M, Shalev A. Prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder
after trauma: current evidence and future directions. Curr Psychiatry Rep.
(2016) 18:20. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0655-0
44. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD. Meta-analysis of risk factors for
posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin
Psychol. (2000) 68:748–766. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748
45. Hepp U, Moergeli H, Buchi S, Bruchhaus-Steinert H, Kraemer B,
Sensky T, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder in serious accidental
injury: 3-year follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry. (2008) 192:376–83.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.030569
46. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS. Predictors of posttraumatic stress
disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. (2003)
129:52–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52
47. Perkonigg A, Pfister H, Stein MB, Höfler M, Lieb R, Maercker A, et al.
Longitudinal course of posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic stress
disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescents and young adults.
Am J Psychiatry. (2005) 162:1320–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1320
48. Peleg T, Shalev AY. Longitudinal studies of PTSD: overview of findings and
methods. CNS Spectr. (2006) 11:589–602. doi: 10.1017/S109285290001364X
49. Heapy AA, Higgins DM, Cervone D, Wandner L, Fenton BT, Kerns RD.
A systematic review of technology-assisted self-management interventions
for chronic pain: looking across treatment modalities. Clin J Pain. (2015)
31:470–92. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000185
50. Kampmann IL, Emmelkamp PMG, Morina N. Meta-analysis of technologyassisted interventions for social anxiety disorder. J Anxiety Disord. (2016)
42:71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.06.007
51. Newman MG, Szkodny LE, Llera SJ, Przeworski A. A review of technologyassisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression:
is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clin Psychol Rev. (2011)
31:89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008
52. Ben-Zion Z, Zeevi Y, Keynan NJ, Admon R, Kozlovski T, Sharon H,
et al. Multi-domain potential biomarkers for post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) severity in recent trauma survivors. Transl Psychiatry. (2020) 10:208.
doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00898-z
53. Moukarzel A, Michelet P, Durand AC, Sebbane M, Bourgeois S,
Markarian T, et al. Burnout syndrome among emergency department staff:
prevalence and associated factors. Biomed Res Int. (2019) 2019:6462472.
doi: 10.1155/2019/6462472
54. Pape-Köhler CIA, Simanski C, Nienaber U, Lefering R. External factors and
the incidence of severe trauma: time, date, season and moon. Injury. (2014)
45:S93–S99. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.027
55. Love J, Zatzick D. Screening and intervention for comorbid substance
disorders, PTSD, depression, and suicide: a trauma center survey. Psychiatr
Serv. (2014) 65:918–923. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300399
56. Broadbent E. Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal
about ourselves. Annu Rev Psychol. (2017) 68:627–52.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
57. Laban G, Kappas A, Morrison V, Cross ES. Protocol for a mediated long-term
experiment with a social robot. PsyArXiv. (2021). doi: 10.31234/osf.io/4z3aw
58. Boumans R, van Meulen F, Hindriks K, Neerincx M, Olde Rikkert
MGM. Robot for health data acquisition among older adults: a pilot
randomised controlled cross-over trial. BMJ Q Safety. (2019) 28:793–9.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008977
59. van der Putte D, Boumans R, Neerincx M, Rikkert MO, de Mul M. A social
robot for autonomous health data acquisition among hospitalized patients:
an exploratory field study. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference
on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Daegu: IEEE (2019). p. 658–9.
60. Vitanza A, D’Onofrio G, Ricciardi F, Sancarlo D, Greco A, Giuliani F.
Assistive robots for the elderly: innovative tools to gather health relevant
data. In: Consoli S, Reforgiato Recupero D, Petkovic M, editors. ´ Data
Science for Healthcare: Methodologies and Applications. Cham: Springer
International Publishing (2019). p. 195–215.
61. Robinson NL, Connolly J, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ. Social robots
as treatment agents: pilot randomized controlled trial to deliver a
behavior change intervention. Internet Intervent. (2020) 21:100320.
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100320
62. Shiomi M, Nakata A, Kanbara M, Hagita N. Robot reciprocation of hugs
increases both interacting times and self-disclosures. Int J Soc Rob. (2020)
13:353–61. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00644-x
63. Ling H, Björling E. Sharing stress with a robot: what would a robot say?
Human Mach Commun. (2020) 1:133–58. doi: 10.30658/hmc.1.8
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org 7 February 2022 | Volume 12 | Article 752874
Laban et al. Social Robots for Supporting PTSD
64. Aroyo AM, Rea F, Sandini G, Sciutti A. Trust and social engineering
in human robot interaction: will a robot make you disclose sensitive
information, conform to its recommendations or gamble? IEEE Rob Autom
Lett. (2018) 3:3701–8. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2018.2856272
65. Birnbaum GE, Mizrahi M, Hoffman G, Reis HT, Finkel EJ, Sass O.
Machines as a source of consolation: robot responsiveness increases human
approach behavior and desire for companionship. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE
International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Christchurch:
IEEE (2016). p. 165–72.
66. De Groot JJ, Barakova E, Lourens T, van Wingerden E, Sterkenburg P.
Game-Based Human-Robot Interaction Promotes Self-disclosure in People
with Visual Impairments and Intellectual Disabilities BT - Understanding
the Brain Function and Emotions. Cham: Springer International Publishing
(2019). p. 262–72.
67. Blixen CE, Kanuch S, Perzynski AT, Thomas C, Dawson NV, Sajatovic M.
Barriers to self-management of serious mental illness and diabetes. Am J
Health Behav. (2016) 40:194–204. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.2.4
68. Merwin E, Hinton I, Dembling B, Stern S. Shortages of rural
mental health professionals. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (2003) 17:42–51.
doi: 10.1053/apnu.2003.1
69. World Health Organization. Mental Health ATLAS 2017. Geneva: WHO
(2018).
70. Quartana PJ, Wilk JE, Thomas JL, Bray RM, Rae Olmsted KL, Brown
JM, et al. Trends in mental health services utilization and stigma in
US soldiers from 2002 to 2011. Am J Public Health. (2014) 104:1671–9.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301971
71. Naifeh JA, Colpe LJ, Aliaga PA, Sampson NA, Heeringa SG, Stein MB, et al.
Barriers to initiating and continuing mental health treatment among soldiers
in the army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army
STARRS). Mil Med. (2016) 181:1021–32. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00211
72. Hines LA, Goodwin L, Jones M, Hull L, Wessely S, Fear NT, et al. Factors
affecting help seeking for mental health problems after deployment to
Iraq and Afghanistan. Psychiatr Serv (Washington, DC). (2014) 65:98–105.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.004972012
73. Kantor V, Knefel M, Lueger-Schuster B. Perceived barriers and facilitators
of mental health service utilization in adult trauma survivors: a systematic
review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2017) 52:52–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.12.001
74. Shalev AY, Freedman S. PTSD following terrorist attacks: a
prospective evaluation. Am J Psychiatry. (2005) 162:1188–91.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1188
75. Deutsch I, Erel H, Paz M, Hoffman G, Zuckerman O. Home robotic devices
for older adults: opportunities and concerns. Comput Human Behav. (2019)
98:122–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.002
76. Wiederhold BK. Can robots help us manage the caregiving
crisis? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network. (2018) 21:533–4.
doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.29123.bkw
77. Hilty DM, Randhawa K, Maheu MM, McKean AJS, Pantera R, Mishkind
MC, et al. A review of telepresence, virtual reality, and augmented
reality applied to clinical care. J Technol Behav Sci. (2020) 5:178–205.
doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00126-x
78. Pavaloiu IB, Vasilateanu A, Popa R, Scurtu D, Hang A, Goga N. Healthcare
robotic telepresence. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on
Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2021. Pitesti: IEEE
(2021).
79. Lou S. Feature Update: Telepresence Enabled by Pepper | SoftBank Robotics;
(2020). Available online at: https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/
blog/news-trends/feature-update-telepresence-enabled-pepper
80. SoftBank Robotics Labs. Pepper Telepresence Toolkit: A toolkit to build
telepresence or teleoperation applications for Pepper QiSDK: talk through
Pepper, drive Pepper around, etc. (2020). Available online at: https://github.
com/softbankrobotics-labs/peppertelepresence-toolkit
81. Fletcher KE, Steinbach S, Lewis F, Hendricks M, Kwan B. Hospitalized
medical patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): review of the
literature and a roadmap for improved care. J Hosp Med. (2020) 19:2020.
doi: 10.12788/jhm.3409
82. Blais RK, Renshaw KD, Jakupcak M. Posttraumatic stress and stigma in
active-duty service members relate to lower likelihood of seeking support.
J Trauma Stress. (2014) 27:116–119. doi: 10.1002/jts.21888
83. Wilson JP, Droždek B, Turkovic S. Posttraumatic shame and guilt.
Trauma Violence Abuse. (2006) 7:122–41. doi: 10.1177/152483800528
5914
84. Saraiya T, Lopez-Castro T. Ashamed and afraid: a scoping review of the role
of shame in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). J Clin Med. (2016) 5:94.
doi: 10.3390/jcm5110094
85. Cunningham KC, LoSavio ST, Dennis PA, Farmer C, Clancy CP, Hertzberg
MA, et al. Shame as a mediator between posttraumatic stress disorder
symptoms and suicidal ideation among veterans. J Affect Disord. (2019)
243:216–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.040
86. Cândea DM, Szentagotai-Tata A. Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness and ˘
anxiety symptoms: a meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord. (2018) 58:78–106.
doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.005
87. Starzynski LL, Ullman SE, Filipas HH, Townsend SM. Correlates of women’s
sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence
Vict. (2005) 20:417–32. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2005.20.4.417
88. Birnbaum GE, Mizrahi M, Hoffman G, Reis HT, Finkel EJ, Sass O.
What robots can teach us about intimacy: the reassuring effects of
robot responsiveness to human disclosure. Comput Human Behav. (2016)
63:416–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.064
89. Björling EA, Rose E, Davidson A, Ren R, Wong D. Can we keep him
forever? Teen’s engagement and desire for emotional connection with a
social robot. Int J Soc Rob. (2019) 12:65–77. doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00
539-6
90. Hoffman G, Birnbaum GE, Vanunu K, Sass O, Reis HT. Robot
responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal.
In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction. HRI â ’14. New York, NY: Association for Computing
Machinery (2014). p. 1–8.
91. Ghazali AS, Ham J, Barakova E, Markopoulos P. Assessing the effect of
persuasive robots interactive social cues on users’ psychological reactance,
liking, trusting beliefs and compliance. Adv Rob. (2019) 33:325–37.
doi: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1589570
92. Utami D, Bickmore TW, Kruger LJ. A robotic couples counselor for
promoting positive communication. In: RO-MAN 2017-26th IEEE
International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.
Lisbon: IEEE (2017). p. 248–55. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2017.81
72310
93. Sandini G, Mohan V, Sciutti A, Morasso P. Social cognition for human-robot
symbiosis - challenges and building blocks. Front Neurorobot. (2018) 12:34.
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00034
94. Wullenkord R, Eyssel F. Societal and ethical issues in HRI.
Curr Rob Rep. (2020) 1:85–96. doi: 10.1007/s43154-020-00
010-9
95. Cross ES, Ramsey R. Mind meets machine: towards a cognitive science
of human–machine interactions. Trends Cogn Sci. (2021) 25:200–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.009
96. Hortensius R, Cross ES. From automata to animate beings: the scope and
limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2018)
1426:93–110. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13727
97. Burke LE, Shiffman S, Music E, Styn MA, Kriska A, Smailagic A,
et al. Ecological momentary assessment in behavioral research: addressing
technological and human participant challenges. J Med Internet Res. (2017)
19:e77. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7138
98. Chandler KD, Hodge CJ, McElvaine K, Olschewski EJ, Melton KK,
Deboeck P. Challenges of ecological momentary assessments to study
family leisure: Participants’ perspectives 2021. J Leisure Res. (2021) 1:1–7.
doi: 10.1080/00222216.2021.2001398
99. Dao KP, De Cocker K, Tong HL, Kocaballi AB, Chow C, Laranjo L.
Smartphone-Delivered ecological momentary interventions based
on ecological momentary assessments to promote health behaviors:
systematic review and adapted checklist for reporting ecological momentary
assessment and intervention studies. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. (2021)
9:e22890. doi: 10.2196/22890
100. Mubin O, Ahmad MI, Kaur S, Shi W, Khan A. Social robots in public spaces:
a meta-review. In: Ge SS, Cabibihan JJ, Salichs MA, Broadbent E, He H,
Wagner AR, et al., editors. Social Robotics. Cham: Springer International
Publishing (2018). p. 213–20.
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org 8 February 2022 | Volume 12 | Article 752874
Laban et al. Social Robots for Supporting PTSD
101. Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Yamada S. Do people with social anxiety
feel anxious about interacting with a robot? AI Soc. (2020) 35:381–90.
doi: 10.1007/s00146-019-00889-9
102. Smith P, Yule W, Perrin S, Tranah T, Dalgleish T, Clark DM. Cognitivebehavioral therapy for PTSD in children and adolescents: a preliminary
randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2007)
46:1051–1061. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318067e288
103. Vermetten E, Bremner JD. Circuits and systems in stress. II. Applications
to neurobiology and treatment in posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress
Anxiety. (2002) 16:14–38. doi: 10.1002/da.10017