Kelp, C. , Carter, A. and Simion, M. (2022) How to be an infallibilist. Philosophical Studies, 179(8), pp. 2675-2682. (doi: 10.1007/s11098-022-01785-7)
Text
264471.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 294kB |
Abstract
While fallibilism has been the dominant view in epistemology in recent times, the field has witnessed the rise of a new form of infallibilism. In a recent book, Jessica Brown has taken on the task of mounting a systematic defence of fallibilism against this new infallibilism. She argues that new infallibilism incurs several problematic commitments that fallibilism can avoid. In addition, the key data points that infallibilists have adduced in support of their view can be accommodated by fallibilism, giving fallibilism the upper hand. This paper develops a rejoinder on behalf of new infallibilism. It explores ways in which new infallibilists can avoid the problematic commitments Brown identifies and provides reason to think that some of the data points supporting new infallibilism cannot be as readily handled by fallibilism as Brown would have us think.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Additional Information: | The authors would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust (#RPG-2019-302), the European Research Council (#948356), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (#100012M_200737/1) for supporting this research. |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Simion, Professor Mona and Kelp, Professor Christoph and Carter, Professor J Adam |
Authors: | Kelp, C., Carter, A., and Simion, M. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | Philosophical Studies |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0031-8116 |
ISSN (Online): | 1573-0883 |
Published Online: | 30 January 2022 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2022 The Authors |
First Published: | First published in Philosophical Studies 179(8): 2675-2682 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record