[1] Gabriella Airenti, Marco Cruciani, and Alessio Plebe. 2019. Editorial: The Cognitive Underpinnings of Anthropomorphism. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019),
1539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01539
[2] Theo Araujo. 2018. Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent
and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior 85 (2018), 183–189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051
[3] Theo Araujo. 2020. Conversational Agent Research Toolkit: An alternative
for creating and managing chatbots for experimental research. Computational
Communication Research 2, 1 (2020), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2020.1.
002.ARAU
[4] Christoph Bartneck, Takayuki Kanda, Omar Mubin, and Abdullah Al Mahmud.
2009. Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 2 (2009), 195–204. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0013-7
[5] Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social
Robotics 1, 1 (2009), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
[6] Pascal Boyer. 1996. What Makes Anthropomorphism Natural: Intuitive Ontology
and Cultural Representations. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
2, 1 (1996), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034634
[7] Elizabeth Broadbent. 2017. Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal
About Ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology 68, 1 (2017), 627–652. https:
//doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
[8] John R Carlson and Robert W Zmud. 1999. Channel Expansion Theory and the
Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions. The Academy of Management
Journal 42, 2 (1999), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/257090
[9] Emily S Cross, Ruud Hortensius, and Agnieszka Wykowska. 2019. From social
brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374,
1771 (2019), 20180024. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0024
[10] Emily S Cross, Richard Ramsey, Roman Liepelt, Wolfgang Prinz, and Antonia de C Hamilton F. 2016. The shaping of social perception by stimulus
and knowledge cues to human animacy. Philosophical transactions of the
Royal Society of London.Series B, Biological sciences 371, 1686 (2016), 20150075.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0075
[11] Charles R Crowell, Jason C Deska, Michael Villano, Julaine Zenk, and John T.
Roddy. 2019. Anthropomorphism of robots: Study of appearance and agency.
Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 5 (2019), e12629. https://doi.org/10.2196/
12629
[12] Richard L Daft and Robert H Lengel. 1986. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32, 5 (1986),
554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
[13] Luisa Damiano and Paul Dumouchel. 2018. Anthropomorphism in Human–Robot
Co-evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018), 468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.
2018.00468
[14] E N Dunkin. 1981. Intelligence and Perception. In Psychology for Physiotherapists.
Macmillan Education UK, London, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-
16600-8_5
[15] Nicholas Epley and Adam Waytz. 2010. Mind Perception. John Wiley and Sons
Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001014
[16] Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A
three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 864–886 pages. https://doi.org/10.
1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
[17] Julia Fink. 2012. Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots
and Human-Robot Interaction. In Social Robotics, Shuzhi Sam Ge, Oussama Khatib,
John-John Cabibihan, Reid Simmons, and Mary-Anne Williams (Eds.). Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
642-34103-8{_}20
[18] Asbjørn Følstad and Marita Skjuve. 2019. Chatbots for Customer Service: User
Experience and Motivation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on
Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery,
New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342784
[19] Asbjørn Følstad and Cameron Taylor. 2020. Conversational Repair in Chatbots
for Customer Service: The Effect of Expressing Uncertainty and Suggesting
Alternatives. In Chatbot Research and Design, Asbjørn Følstad, Theo Araujo,
Symeon Papadopoulos, Effie Lai-Chong Law, Ole-Christoffer Granmo, Ewa Luger,
and Petter Bae Brandtzaeg (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 201–
214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7{_}14
[20] Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin. 2018. Introduction: Anthropocentrism,
egocentrism and the notion of Animacy Hierarchy. International Journal of
Language and Culture 5, 2 (2018), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00004.gar
[21] Eun Go and S Shyam Sundar. 2019. Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual,
identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Computers in Human
Behavior 97 (2019), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020
[22] Kurt Gray, Liane Young, and Adam Waytz. 2012. Mind Perception Is the Essence
of Morality. Psychological Inquiry 23, 2 (2012), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/
1047840X.2012.651387
[23] David Griol, Javier Carbó, and José M Molina. 2013. AN AUTOMATIC DIALOG
SIMULATION TECHNIQUE TO DEVELOP AND EVALUATE INTERACTIVE
CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS. Applied Artificial Intelligence 27, 9 (2013), 759–
780. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2013.835230
[24] Andrew F Hayes. 2018. Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation:
Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs 85, 1
(2018), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
[25] A F Hays. 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process
Analysis: A Regession Approach. Number August. Guilford publications. 3–4
pages.
[26] Anna Henschel, Guy Laban, and Emily S Cross. 2021. What Makes a Robot Social?
A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You.
Current Robotics Reports (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00035-0
[27] Ruud Hortensius and Emily S Cross. 2018. From automata to animate beings: the
scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents. Annals of the New
York Academy of Sciences 1426, 1 (2018), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.
13727
[28] Ruud Hortensius, Felix Hekele, and Emily S Cross. 2018. The Perception of
Emotion in Artificial Agents. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental
Systems 10, 4 (2018), 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2826921
[29] Daniel Johnson and John Gardner. 2009. Exploring mindlessness as an explanation
for the media equation: a study of stereotyping in computer tutorials. Personal
and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 2 (2009), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-
007-0193-9
[30] Guy Laban and Theo Araujo. 2020. The Effect of Personalization Techniques
in Users’ Perceptions of Conversational Recommender System. In IVA ’20: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
(IVA ’20). ACM, Virtual Event, Glasgow, Scotland UK, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/
3383652.3423890
[31] Guy Laban and Theo Araujo. 2020. Working Together with Conversational
Agents: The Relationship of Perceived Cooperation with Service Performance
Evaluations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture
Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Følstad Asbjørn,
Theo Araujo, Symeon Papadopoulos, Effie L Law, Ole-Christoffer Granmo, Ewa
Luger, and Petter B Brandtzaeg (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham,
215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7{_}15
[32] Guy Laban, Jean-Noël George, Val Morrison, and Emily S. Cross. 2021. Tell me
more! Assessing interactions with social robots from speech. Paladyn, Journal of
Behavioral Robotics 12, 1 (2021), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2021-0011
[33] Guy Laban, Val Morrison, and Emily S Cross. 2020. Let’s Talk About It!
Subjective and Objective Disclosures to Social Robots. In Companion of the
2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 328–330. https:
//doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378252
[34] Antonio Lieto, Christian Lebiere, and Alessandro Oltramari. 2018. The knowledge
level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possible developments.
Cognitive Systems Research 48 (2018), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.
2017.05.001
[35] Phil McAleer, Barbara Mazzarino, Gaultiero Volpe, Antonio Camurri, Helena
Patterson, and Frank Pollick. 2004. Perceiving Animacy and Arousal in Transformed Displays of Human Interaction. Journal of Vision 4, 8 (8 2004), 230.
https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.230
[36] Phil McAleer, Helena M Paterson, Barbara Mazzarino, and Frank E Pollick. 2005.
Towards canonical views of animacy from scenes of human action. Journal of
Vision 5, 8 (9 2005), 936. https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.936
[37] Barbara C N Müller, Xin Gao, Sari R R Nijssen, and Tom G E Damen. 2020. I,
Robot: How Human Appearance and Mind Attribution Relate to the Perceived
Danger of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics (2020). https://doi.org/
10.1007/s12369-020-00663-8
[38] Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: Social
Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1 (2000), 81–103. https:
//doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
[39] Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R Tauber. 1994. Computers Are Social
Actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems (CHI ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,
72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703
[40] Ulric Neisser, Gwyneth Boodoo, Thomas J Bouchard Jr., A Wade Boykin, Nathan
Brody, Stephen J Ceci, Diane F Halpern, John C Loehlin, Robert Perloff, Robert J
Sternberg, and Susana Urbina. 1996. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist 51, 2 (1996), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
[41] Kristopher J Preacher and Andrew F Hayes. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures
for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 4 (2004), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/
BF03206553
309
HAI ’21, November 9–11, 2021, Virtual Event, Japan G. Laban
[42] Byron Reeves and Clifford Ivar Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people
treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge
university press.
[43] Giulio Sandini, Vishwanathan Mohan, Alessandra Sciutti, and Pietro Morasso.
2018. Social Cognition for Human-Robot Symbiosis - Challenges and Building
Blocks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12 (2018), 34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.
2018.00034
[44] Brian J Scholl and Patrice D Tremoulet. 2000. Perceptual causality and animacy.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 8 (8 2000), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-
6613(00)01506-0
[45] Bayan Abu Shawar and Eric Atwell. 2007. Chatbots: are they really useful? Ldv
Forum 22, 1 (2007), 29–49.
[46] Marita Skjuve, Ida Haugstveit, Asbjørn Følstad, and Petter Brandtzaeg. 2019.
Help! Is my chatbot falling into the uncanny valley? An empirical study of user
experience in human-chatbot interaction. Human Technology 15 (2019), 30–54.
https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201902201607
[47] Robert J Sternberg. 1999. The Theory of Successful Intelligence. Review of General
Psychology 3, 4 (12 1999), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
[48] Robert J Sternberg. 2003. A Broad View of Intelligence: The Theory of Successful
Intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 55, 3 (2003),
139–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.55.3.139
[49] S S Sundar and Sampada S Marathe. 2010. Personalization versus Customization:
The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage. Human Communication
Research 36, 3 (2010), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x
[50] Michelle M E Van Pinxteren, Mark Pluymaekers, and Jos G A M Lemmink. 2020.
Human-like communication in conversational agents: a literature review and
research agenda. Journal of Service Management (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/
JOSM-06-2019-0175
[51] Hilde A M Voorveld and Theo Araujo. 2020. How Social Cues in Virtual Assistants
Influence Concerns and Persuasion: The Role of Voice and a Human Name.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking (2020). https://doi.org/10.1089/
cyber.2019.0205
[52] Rebecca M Warner and David B Sugarman. 1986. Attributions of personality based
on physical appearance, speech, and handwriting. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 50, 4 (1986), 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.792
[53] Adam Waytz, John Cacioppo, and Nicholas Epley. 2010. Who Sees Human?: The
Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5, 3 (2010), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336
![[img]](https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
References
References