Aristotle, Hobbes and chimpanzees

Berry, C. (2006) Aristotle, Hobbes and chimpanzees. Political Studies, 54(4), pp. 827-845. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00627.x)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.


The article is an exercise in the philosophical anthropology of politics. According to Aristotle, man is a political animal but not uniquely so, whereas, according to Hobbes, politics is artificial and the preserve of humans alone. Both Aristotle and Hobbes draw upon contemporary science. The dominant relevant science today is neo-Darwinism – humans are products of evolution and genetically closely related to the other primates. The argument that chimpanzees are political, thus putatively endorsing an Aristotelian rather than a Hobbesian perspective, is scrutinised. However, at best, chimpanzees are only metaphorically political. While this conclusion may weaken the Aristotelian position, it cannot of itself vindicate the Hobbesian one. The philosophical anthropological endeavour to investigate the relation between politics and human nature still has work to do.

Item Type:Articles
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Berry, Professor Christopher
Authors: Berry, C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Political Studies
Publisher:Political Studies Association and Blackwell Publishing
Published Online:23 November 2006

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record