Proxy rated quality of life of care home residents with dementia: a systematic review

Robertson, S., Cooper, C., Hoe, J., Hamilton, O. , Stringer, A. and Livingston, G. (2017) Proxy rated quality of life of care home residents with dementia: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(4), pp. 569-581. (doi: 10.1017/S1041610216002167) (PMID:28088926) (PMCID:PMC5964456)

[img] Text
249364.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

361kB

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome for people with dementia living in care homes but usually needs to be rated by a proxy. We do not know if relative or paid carer proxy reports differ. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of data investigating whether and how these proxy reports of QoL differ. Methods: We searched four databases: Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL in October 2015 with the terms: dementia, QoL, proxy, and care home. Included studies either compared proxy QoL ratings or investigated the factors associated with them. We meta-analyzed data comparing staff and family proxy rated QoL. Results: We included 17/105 papers identified. We found no difference between global proxy ratings of QoL (n = 1,290; pooled effect size 0.06 (95% CI = −0.08 to 0.19)). Studies investigating factors associated with ratings (n = 3,537) found family and staff ratings correlated with the resident's physical and mental health. Staff who were more distressed rated resident QoL lower. Relatives rated it lower when the resident had lived in the care home for longer, when they observed more restraint, or contributed more to fees. Conclusions: Relatives and staff proxy QoL ratings share a clear relationship to resident health and overall ratings were similar. Rater-specific factors were, however, also associated with scores. Understanding why different raters consider the QoL of the same person differently is an important consideration when evaluating the meaning of proxy rated QoL. Proxy raters’ backgrounds may affect their rating of QoL.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This research was initially funded by the ESRC & NIHR Improving Dementia Care grant in response to the UK Prime Minister’s Challenge on Dementia. Sarah Robertson later received funding for her PhD from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames at Bart’s Health NHS Trust.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Hamilton, Dr Olivia
Authors: Robertson, S., Cooper, C., Hoe, J., Hamilton, O., Stringer, A., and Livingston, G.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1041-6102
ISSN (Online):1741-203X
Published Online:16 January 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 International Psychogeriatric Association
First Published:First published in International Psychogeriatrics 29(4): 569-581
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record