Why the jury is, and should still be, out on rape deliberation

Chalmers, J. , Leverick, F. and Munro, V. E. (2021) Why the jury is, and should still be, out on rape deliberation. Criminal Law Review, 2021(9), pp. 753-771.

[img] Text
244551.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 September 2022.

327kB

Abstract

Reflects on the findings of research by Cheryl Thomas on juror deliberations and decision-making in rape cases, why these may be more limited than she suggests, and whether they represent a missed opportunity in respect of issues such as juror misconceptions, prejudice or adherence to "rape myths".

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Chalmers, Professor James and Leverick, Professor Fiona
Authors: Chalmers, J., Leverick, F., and Munro, V. E.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Criminal Law Review
Publisher:Sweet & Maxwell
ISSN:0011-135X
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 Thomson Reuters
First Published:First published in Criminal Law Review 2021(9): 753-771
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record