Evaluation of environmental and comfort improvements on affective welfare in heifer calves on smallholder dairy farms

Kimeli, P., VanLeeuwen, J., Gitau, G.K., Heider, L.C., McKenna, S.L., Greenwood, S.J. and Richards, S. (2021) Evaluation of environmental and comfort improvements on affective welfare in heifer calves on smallholder dairy farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 189, 105296. (doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105296) (PMID:33662883)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

A controlled trial on zero-grazed smallholder dairy farms was conducted to determine the effect of environmental and comfort improvements on sucking and lying behaviours in heifer calves on Kenyan smallholder dairy farms. The study involved 187 heifer calves from 150 farms in two Kenyan counties, 75 farms per county. Farms in one county received animal welfare training and improvements in the calf pen that included: 1) placement of rubber mats on the lying area; 2) fixing gaps/holes in the flooring and roofing; and 3) attaching a rubber nipple on the wall of the calf pen. During the 16-month data collection period, bimonthly farm visits were used to collect data on lying time (using accelerometers) and other animal- and farm-level factors. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to model daily lying times and frequency of lying bouts, with the animal as a random effect. Over the visits, daily lying times and lying bout durations averaged 12.6–86.7 min/bout, respectively, while the median for the frequency of lying bouts was between 30–46/day. Provision of rubber nipples for non-nutritive sucking lowered proportions of cross-sucking, self-sucking and object-sucking behaviours slightly but not significantly. In a final daily lying time model, superficial lymph node enlargement, body condition score and use of wood shaving/ sawdust/ crop waste as beddings had positive associations. In contrast, group housing and rubber mat use had negative associations with daily lying time. In an interaction term, lying time was significantly higher for calves on clean versus dirty floors if the age was <190 days but this difference diminished significantly in older animals. In a second interaction term, lying time was lower for calves with leaking versus non-leaking roofs, regardless of the pen floor level, but lying time was higher on elevated than non-elevated floors if the roof was intact. In the final model of the frequency of lying bouts, the use of a rubber mat, the years of experience in dairy farming, and calf body weight had negative associations. In contrast, body condition score had a positive association. In an interaction, the frequency of daily lying bouts was lower on clean floors than dirty floors, irrespective of tethering status, but when the floor was dirty, the lying bouts were higher for animals not tethered than the ones sometimes tethered. We conclude that the comfort improvements enhanced the welfare and lying experience of heifer calves on smallholder dairy farms.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This research was made possible with the financial support of the Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Centre and University of Prince Edward Island.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Richards, Dr Shauna
Authors: Kimeli, P., VanLeeuwen, J., Gitau, G.K., Heider, L.C., McKenna, S.L., Greenwood, S.J., and Richards, S.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0167-5877
ISSN (Online):1873-1716
Published Online:17 February 2021

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record